Skip to main content

Busy UK motorway junction demolished in tight time frame – Mark Anthony reports

Military-style planning and overwhelming demolition firepower ensured that Armac Group avoided financial penalties and the wrath of drivers on one of the UK’s busiest motorway intersections. Demolition & Dismantling reports. 6 January is traditionally known for the visit of the three wise men to Bethlehem. However, on 6 January 2012, three wise demolition engineers from Armac Group was tasked with dismantling the monumental structure known as Catthorpe Viaduct: the main overbridge of the M6/M1/A14 interc
October 18, 2012 Read time: 5 mins

Original article published in the summer edition of Demolition & Dismantling Magazine, published by 6755 Demolition News as Shock and Awe

Military-style planning and overwhelming demolition firepower ensured that Armac Group avoided financial penalties and the wrath of drivers on one of the UK’s busiest motorway intersections.  Demolition & Dismantling reports.

6 January is traditionally known for the visit of the three wise men to Bethlehem. However, on 6 January 2012, three wise demolition engineers from 6756 Armac Group were tasked with dismantling the monumental structure known as Catthorpe Viaduct: the main overbridge of the M6/M1/A14 interchange, and one of the busiest intersections of the UK Motorway network.

The 4,500 tonne structure required dismantling due to the failed hinge joints which carried the suspended spans above the running lanes of the M1. The structure had been closely monitored over the past 15 years, and an additional Catch Prop structure had been constructed under the East Hinge in case of catastrophic failure. 

Prior Planning

The detailed planning and design began as early as 2009 when design engineers from Armac’s specialist Rail & Civils division were requested by the 2309 Highways Agency (HA) and 2296 Skanska to provide Early Contractor Involvement for the scheme. Over two years, various methods of dismantling from explosive to cut and heavy lift to SPMT’s (self propelled multi axle transporters) were considered and evaluated.  At the same time, the company had to factor in the shortest possible disruption to M1 traffic.
 
By mid 2010 the final design and target cost had been agreed and Armac were instructed to proceed to a detailed design stage.   The selected dismantling method was progressive fragmentation of the structure using large demolition excavators and heavy demolition attachments with debris falling onto a protective layer of crane mats deployed to protect the existing carriageway.  Although selected as the optimum method it still provided significant challenges.

The replacement viaduct had been designed and constructed as part of the wider remodelling of the M1/M6/A14 interchange. As a result, the new structure had to be constructed just 6 metres from the old structure to tie in with the new junction alignment. The close proximity of this structure provided one of the greatest challenges to the Armac design team. Detailed CAD modelling of the structures demonstrated that there was enough working space, but even so it meant that the demolition between the structures required detailed control on the night from the demolition engineers supervising the break out.

In addition, the length of the closure was a tough point of negotiation. Armac had originally proposed a single 48 hour closure from Friday midnight to Sunday midnight.  However, the HA was reluctant to close this busy section of Motorway for such a long time and preferred a staged closure over three weekends  with the central suspended spans and central leaf pier being removed under a full 18 hour closure and then the outside spans under separate 12 hour closures. 

At £ 18,000 per hour penalties, the large time reduction certainly focused our mind,” says Armac’s Rail & Civils director Noel McLean. “But a detailed hour-by-hour programme and finite analysis of the critical path gave us the confidence that we could meet such a difficult timeline.’

Impressive Firepower

With some 4,000 tonnes of concrete, 500 tonnes of reinforcement steel and a three kilometre run to the tip area, a major logistical operation was planned by the Armac team. With all plant and equipment being delivered and removed from the project on a ‘just in time’ basis the project had assembled what is believed to be the largest ever assembly of demolition fire power for a bridge demolition comprising 14 hydraulic excavators ranging from 70 to 50 tonnes; two 7 tonne hydraulic breakers; four 6 tonne breakers; six 4 tonne beakers; four 6 tonne pulverisers; four 4 tonne hydraulic processors; two 7 tonne shears; and a fleet of 12 x 40 tonne payload dumptrucks.

Behind the lead demolition machines was a full back up team of ground crews, plant technicians, hydraulic hose fitters, tyre fitter and hiab and standby excavators and attachments.

The demolition was undertaken over four 10 hour shifts with a one hour overlap between to allow for a smooth changeover and continuous working.

With the major publicity surrounding the closure and a low traffic count the motorway was closed on time and handed over to Armac engineers. The carriageway protection system was quickly installed and the first strike on the bridge was achieved ahead of programme. 

As demolition progressed, it quickly became apparent that the supposedly failing structure was a worthy contender for the heavy demolition firepower that had been assembled.

“Breaking one metre thick concrete was never being going to be easy but add in 40 years of curing at 1N per year and 30 -50 mm reinforcement bar, and the challenge was on,” McLean says. Under the watchful eye of national press and senior HA staff just six metres away on the new structure, the demolition teams worked expediently from one shift through to the next reducing the structure to the ground, processing the arisings, clearing the material to the tip and clearing the protection system.

After 32 hours, the carriageway was handed back for barrier replacement and traffic was running back on time with all of the structure removed at midday Sunday.

“Having removed numerous bridge structures over the years, we will probably never remove anything on this scale again.  But I am pleased we pulled it off successfully with no safety issues, all of the structure removed, the motorway reopened on time and without a scratch to the carriageway,” Noel McLean concludes. “On the whole it was a fantastic performance by all of the team.”
No video provider was found to handle the given URL. See the documentation for more information.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • VIDEO: Bridge demolition on key A90 route in Scotland
    November 4, 2015
    Demolition work has been carried out on a bridge crossing the busy A90 route in Scotland, just to the north of the capital, Edinburgh. The bridge carried the B900 over the A90 but had to be removed as its narrow design prevented the route from being upgraded to full motorway status. The first stage of the demolition work was carried out on October 24th and 25th, with the second stage on October 31st and November 1st and final remedial work to be carried out on November 14th and 15th.
  • The A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme takes shape
    May 31, 2017
    Highways England’s project manager gives sneak peek into progress on the UK’s biggest road upgrade now under construction. Road construction workers often find interesting buried items when building roads and the UK’s A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme is proving the point. It’s been less than half a year since construction started on the €1.76 billion A14 scheme, Highways England’s largest ongoing project. Highways England is the wholly government-owned company responsible for modernising, main
  • STRABAG wins contract for Hamburg, Germany
    August 26, 2020
    STRABAG has won a major highway contract in Hamburg, Germany.
  • The Lessons of the Genoa bridge collapse
    April 23, 2019
    The partial collapse of the Polcevera viaduct, better known as the Morandi Bridge, has prompted debate regarding the technical and administrative aspects of maintaining road infrastructures. We discussed it with the engineer Gabriele Camomilla, former Director of Research and Maintenance of the Società Autostrade, who coordinated the only major structural intervention performed on the bridge, carried out in the early 1990s