Slovakia’s troubled D1 highway

Slovakia’s Ministry of Transport is to finance construction work on the 75km section of D1 highway between Martin and Presov from state funds, with work expected to start in the second quarter of 2011.
February 20, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
2875 Slovakia’s Ministry of Transport is to finance construction work on the 75km section of D1 highway between Martin and Presov from state funds, with work expected to start in the second quarter of 2011.

The move towards state funding is a major change in policy as the highway was originally planned to be paid for through a PPP by the Slovenske Dialnice consortium, which had won the concession for the project.

However, the deal was cancelled and Slovenske Dialnice has said it will dispute a €10 million fine being imposed by the Ministry for allegedly not being able to secure finance for the construction and operation of the Martin-Presov section.

Slovak construction firm 2877 Doprastav, which was part of the Slovenske Dialnice consortium, said that it secured finance worth €1.66 billion from 18 commercial banks. Of this, €1 billion was from the 1054 European Investment Bank (EIB); €190 million from the 1166 European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and €379 million from other sources. The total finances available for the project totalled €3.23 billion, which was sufficient for the project, according to Doprastav.

The construction companies claim the project failed due to objections stemming from environmental groups, for which the government is responsible, and the EIB and EBRD expressed concern over the D1 project when the environmental issues were revealed.

Questions were raised regarding the legality of the environmental impact assessment, which resulted in the project being scrutinised by the 2465 European Commission. After this the EIB and EBRD showed reservations as pushing ahead with the project as it stood could end in a legal tangle at the European Court of Justice.

Following elections in Slovakia a new administration took power and announced its concern over the cost of the D1 project, although the consortium did manage to reduce the budget required for the work by addressing bank interest charges. Responsibility for the original environmental impact assessment may prove to be the key to this complex legal tangle.

Related Content

  • New bridge for Komarno and Komarom
    May 31, 2017
    Hungarian construction companies Hidepito and Meszaros es Meszaros have won a tender for a new bridge over the Danube River between Slovakia and Hungary.
    Read More
  • Unveiling of Australia’s WestConnex road project funding plan
    June 24, 2013
    The state government of New South Wales, Australia will ask the private sector to contribute to the funding of the 33km WestConnex road project. While initial sections of the road will be financed by the state government, its following phase will be financed by the private sector. For the project, a total of US$1.66 billion (AUD 1.8bn) will be allocated by the state government over a four-year period. Of the total, $102.22 million (AUD 111mn) will be spent in 2013-2014. The development was mentioned by Trea
    Read More
  • European transport funding until 2024
    November 8, 2019
    The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is setting out its new transport development plan for the coming five years. The EBRD has approved a new Transport Sector Strategy for the 2019-2024 period, intended to refine the previous strategy. The aim is to work in a more focussed way on the emerging green economy and climate targets in a sector that, while slow to change, is a catalyst for economic and inclusive growth. Since the EBRD’s previous strategy came into force, global policymak
    Read More
  • European regulations for engine emissions are getting tougher
    January 4, 2013
    Emissions remain the focus for engine development but equipment manufacturers want clarity from regulators. Emissions remain a major challenge for the off-highway construction equipment market. The EU has tough targets in this respect and its objective is an overall reduction of CO2 emissions of 80-95% by the year 2050, compared to 1990 levels. There is considerable research already underway on how to reduce fuel consumption and to help ensure the security of energy supply. A number of industry sectors, suc
    Read More

Highlighted Content