Skip to main content

Vancouver eyes bridge, tunnel options

The Burrard Inlet Rapid Transit Study has listed five potential crossings.
By David Arminas September 25, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
The technical feasibility study was led by engineering consultancy Mott MacDonald Canada (photo: British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure)

The British Columbia government has identified five potential crossings for the proposed high-capacity rapid transit across the Burrard Inlet from Vancouver to the North Shore.

The technical feasibility study, led by engineering consultancy Mott MacDonald Canada, has come up with three tunnel proposals and two bridge proposals for cars and buses.

The plan will help inform the long-term Transport 2050 planning, led by TransLink and the Mayors’ Council, according to a statement by the BC government’s Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.

Possible routes for future planning consideration are:
•     Downtown Vancouver to Lonsdale via First Narrows (tunnel crossing)
•     Downtown Vancouver to Lonsdale via Brockton Point (tunnel crossing)
•     Downtown Vancouver to West Vancouver via Lonsdale (tunnel crossing)
•     Downtown Vancouver to Lonsdale via Second Narrows (new bridge crossing)
•     Burnaby to Lonsdale via Second Narrows (new bridge crossing)

The ministry, the districts of North Vancouver and West Vancouver and the cities of Vancouver and North Vancouver all contributed funding towards the study. TransLink oversaw the technical work.

The technical feasibility study was also the first to be a co-ordinated effort by the BC province in partnership with Indigenous governments, municipalities and TransLink to identify a potential rapid transit solution across the Burrard Inlet.

TransLink is the Vancouver area’s regional transportation authority coordinating transit throughout the lower mainland area – around the Fraser River Valley.

The Mayors' Council, set up by TransLink, is composed of representatives from each of the 21 municipalities within the transportation service region. It also includes Indigenous – native American - groups such as the Tsawwassen First Nation.

Improved transit is part of the BC government’s CleanBC plan that aims to reduce congestion and carbon pollution. CleanBC was developed in collaboration with the BC Green Party, an environmental political party.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • New version of world’s longest floating bridge
    August 12, 2014
    The creation of a new version of the world’s longest floating bridge in Seattle, in the US state of Washington, is among the world’s most eye-catching current bridge engineering projects. It is an impressive example of the health of the bridge replacement sector, particularly in the US, leaving it well placed for growth. Guy Woodford reports Already the world’s longest floating bridge at over 2,310m long, the Governor Albert D Rosellini-Evergreen Point Floating Bridge in Seattle in the United States is g
  • On the road to the IRF Istanbul Congress, first stop: decarbonisation
    May 30, 2024

    As the world gears up for the highly anticipated IRF World Congress 2024 to be hosted in Istanbul on 15-18 October 2024, work on some of the core themes of the Congress is moving on steadily.

    Under the overarching theme of “Connecting to Empower Mobility: Roads as Enablers of a Sustainable Future for All”, the Congress serves as a dynamic platform to explore innovative solutions and collaborative efforts.

  • UK hosts world’s first zero-emissions Portland cement industrial trial
    February 8, 2023
    The UK is hosting the world’s first zero-emissions Portland cement industrial trial
  • Highways: environmental problem or environmental enhancement?
    March 21, 2016
    Highways need not be a blight on the countryside that many people, urban planners included, believe they will always be. By Bram Miller, director, and Martin Broderick, environmental consultant, at Ramboll Environ While the world’s highway networks bring undoubted economic and social benefits, they are generally perceived to lead to negative environmental impacts. Some may consider this an unfair reputation, but it is difficult to argue that in the majority of cases both the construction and operation of