Skip to main content

Vancouver eyes bridge, tunnel options

The Burrard Inlet Rapid Transit Study has listed five potential crossings.
By David Arminas September 25, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
The technical feasibility study was led by engineering consultancy Mott MacDonald Canada (photo: British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure)

The British Columbia government has identified five potential crossings for the proposed high-capacity rapid transit across the Burrard Inlet from Vancouver to the North Shore.

The technical feasibility study, led by engineering consultancy Mott MacDonald Canada, has come up with three tunnel proposals and two bridge proposals for cars and buses.

The plan will help inform the long-term Transport 2050 planning, led by TransLink and the Mayors’ Council, according to a statement by the BC government’s Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.

Possible routes for future planning consideration are:
•     Downtown Vancouver to Lonsdale via First Narrows (tunnel crossing)
•     Downtown Vancouver to Lonsdale via Brockton Point (tunnel crossing)
•     Downtown Vancouver to West Vancouver via Lonsdale (tunnel crossing)
•     Downtown Vancouver to Lonsdale via Second Narrows (new bridge crossing)
•     Burnaby to Lonsdale via Second Narrows (new bridge crossing)

The ministry, the districts of North Vancouver and West Vancouver and the cities of Vancouver and North Vancouver all contributed funding towards the study. TransLink oversaw the technical work.

The technical feasibility study was also the first to be a co-ordinated effort by the BC province in partnership with Indigenous governments, municipalities and TransLink to identify a potential rapid transit solution across the Burrard Inlet.

TransLink is the Vancouver area’s regional transportation authority coordinating transit throughout the lower mainland area – around the Fraser River Valley.

The Mayors' Council, set up by TransLink, is composed of representatives from each of the 21 municipalities within the transportation service region. It also includes Indigenous – native American - groups such as the Tsawwassen First Nation.

Improved transit is part of the BC government’s CleanBC plan that aims to reduce congestion and carbon pollution. CleanBC was developed in collaboration with the BC Green Party, an environmental political party.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Contract to improve UK port connectivity
    April 8, 2014
    The Mott MacDonald Grontmij joint venture (MMG JV) is now working on the contract for the technical assurance role for the A160/A180 link to the Port of Immingham. The road project is located near Grimsby in the UK and is being developed by the Highways Agency as part of the national strategic road network improvement strategy. This is one of four schemes chosen for progression under the accelerated delivery programme and aims to reduce traffic congestion, cut journey times and increase safety. Works includ
  • Environmental solutions for tomorrow's roads
    August 2, 2012
    Leading the change, IRF organises its 2nd Conference on Roads & Environment in Geneva, Switzerland on 10-11 November 2008 An opinion poll in the UK at the end of June showed that more people think their government should first try to tackle environmental issues before trying to tackle global economic problems. Two-thirds of people were even in favour of green taxes, either now or when economic conditions improve. The environment remains high on the agenda in most countries, including in those where public o
  • Ireland road advisory contract award
    December 19, 2023
    An Irish road project advisory contract has been awarded.
  • ACE/AECOM report: private sector and user-pay for English roads
    May 14, 2018
    It’s one minute to midnight for funding England’s roads, according to a timely new report, and the clock’s big hand is pointing to some form of user-pay solution, reports David Arminas Is there any way out of future user-pay funding for England’s highway infrastructure? The answer is a resounding ‘no’, according to the recently published report: Funding Roads for the Future. The brief 25-page document by the London-based Association for Consultancy and Engineering, ACE**, sums up the state of England’s ro