Skip to main content

US infrastructure spending to benefit from state initiatives

US infrastructure spending looks set to benefit from state initiatives.
By MJ Woof November 17, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Transport infrastructure will benefit from new funding in many US states - image © courtesy of Mike Woof
Up to 18 states in the US will see major infrastructure developments following moves to ensure funding. An analysis by the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) highlights the move. This shows that voters in 18 states have approved a record 94% of state and local ballot initiatives to date, providing an additional US$14 billion in one-time and recurring revenue for transportation improvements.

Results are still pending for 13 measures, but the analysis by ARTBA’s Transportation Investment Advocacy Center (ARTBA-TIAC) indicates voters approved 303 of 322 initiatives, the highest approval rate in the 20 years ARTBA has been tracking initiatives.
 
“More than ever before, these results prove that improving transportation infrastructure is something Americans voters strongly support,” said ARTBA senior vice president and chief economist Dr Alison Black.

Arkansas voters approved the renewal of a half-cent sales tax increase. The measure, originally approved by voters in 2012, is projected to raise approximately $205 million annually for state highways and $44 million annually for localities.

In Austin, Texas, more than two-thirds of voters endorsed a $7.1 billion transportation bond. Revenue raised by the bond offering will fund the initial and ongoing costs of Project Connect, a transit plan anchored by two high-capacity light rail lines serving the city’s densest neighbourhoods.

Historically, most transportation measures are placed on the ballot in even-numbered years when congressional or presidential elections drive higher turnout. This year, the impacts of COVID-19 caused several notable measures to be dropped. These included measures in the California’s Bay Area, Sacramento, and Riverside counties that were expected to raise over $100 billion in revenue over the next 40 years. Proponents are expected to try again in the next election cycle.

The approved 2020 measures will support $12.7 billion in new transportation investment revenue and $1.3 billion in continued funding through tax extensions, renewals or protections.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • US city of Vancouver approves new I-5 bridge
    July 18, 2022
    Vancouver in the US state of Washington and Portland in the state of Oregon are aiming for a new road bridge with the possibility of accommodating light rail transport.
  • Make the case for electronic tolling, ASECAP conference delegates heard
    September 14, 2015
    Mobility pricing and electronic tolling is the future, delegates to a recent ASECAP Study Days conference, reports Geoff Hadwick at the Lisbon event. The international road tolling industry is failing to make its case and the sector is losing out to other social and political lobby groups. As a result, “tolling is still on the sidelines”, according to the head of the Washington-based International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association. IBTTA chief executive Pat Jones issued his stark warning at the
  • Ohio looks to Turnpike options
    April 25, 2012
    A newly commissioned study by consulting firm KPMG should answer many Ohio Turnpike questions and help to provide guidance for deciding the future of the link.
  • David Barwell suggests six steps for closing the UK funding gap
    January 11, 2019
    Six steps for closing the UK funding gap Plenty of private money is seeking UK investment opportunities. The government and the infrastructure sector in general must make projects more attractive, writes David Barwell* It is widely acknowledged that the UK faces mounting economic, environmental and social problems if the nation's infrastructure fails to meet present and future demands. Government estimates propose that almost €561 billion is required to bridge the infrastructure funding gap. As part o