Skip to main content

Trump loses key infrastructure adviser DJ Gribbin

The key infrastructure policy adviser to US president Donald Trump has resigned, according to US media reports. DJ Gribbin is "moving on" to pursue unspecified opportunities, a White House official told the Washington Examiner newspaper. Gribbin joined the White House staff in February 2017 to advise Trump on how he could fulfil his election promise to boost infrastructure spending with around US$200 billion. Gribbin previously worked as chief counsel for the Federal Highway Administration and general
April 5, 2018 Read time: 2 mins
Too late for this US bridge, but will others get saved?

The key infrastructure policy adviser to US president Donald Trump has resigned, according to US media reports.

DJ Gribbin is "moving on" to pursue unspecified opportunities, a White House official told the Washington Examiner newspaper.

Gribbin joined the White House staff in February 2017 to advise Trump on how he could fulfil his election promise to boost infrastructure spending with around US$200 billion.

Gribbin previously worked as chief counsel for the 2410 Federal Highway Administration and general counsel for the Department of Transportation. He was also a director of public sector business development at Koch Industries, a manufacturer, refiner and distributer of petroleum, chemicals and energy products.

Trump’s proposed $200 billion in federal funds is to encourage states, cities and private enterprise to invest in roads, bridges, dams, airports and other infrastructure. The money is expected to be paid out dependent upon investment by lower governments and businesses which the Trump administration will reach around $1trillion itself.

But there are doubts that Trump will get a bill through Congress that would allow his planned federal handouts, according to analysts. This is even though the money is desperately needed. Last year, the 2600 American Society of Civil Engineers gave the US’s infrastructure a D+ grade and said failure to act would cost the US economy $4 trillion by 2025.

Political opposition in Congress has pitted the opposition Demnocrats – which normally favour federal public works spending – against Trump’s Republican Party Congressional members. The Democrats have proposed their own plan that would inject $1 trillion in direct federal infrastructure spending – five times Trump’s  proposal.

Getting his own Republicans on side may not be easy either. The party is traditionally against public works spending, even more so now given Trump’s $1.5 trillion tax cut plan announced last year. Another $420 billion could be added to the national debt, some analysts have pointed out.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Vast majority of Americans oppose raising gas tax
    April 25, 2012
    A majority of Americans believe new transportation projects should be paid for with user-fees instead of tax increases, according to a new national Reason-Rupe poll of 1,200 adults on cell phones and land lines.
  • Vast majority of Americans oppose raising gas tax
    May 2, 2012
    A majority of Americans believe new transportation projects should be paid for with user-fees instead of tax increases, according to a new national Reason-Rupe poll of 1,200 adults on cell phones and land lines.
  • Debating infrastructure funding solutions
    March 21, 2012
    With funding of road, bridge, tunnel and highway infrastructure a topic of debate in many developed and developing nations at present, different solutions are in the frame for discussion. Funding highway construction and maintenance through taxation is falling out of favour in many countries, simply because the costs of meeting transport infrastructure needs are so vast.
  • Futureproofing UK construction equipment resilience
    May 5, 2021
    Rob Oliver is the longstanding CEO of the Construction Equipment Association (CEA), the UK trade association for the UK construction equipment industry. Guy Woodford recently caught up with him to discuss the industry’s health and the key issues facing the CEA and its members in 2021 and beyond.