Skip to main content

On the road to commonality

Commonality for construction machine road use requirements is being suggested for Europe.
By MJ Woof February 26, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
The requirements for the use of construction machines on road vary widely across, the EU, perhaps most of all with regard to cranes – image © courtesy of Mike Woof

The president of the European construction machinery manufacturer’s association, CECE, is calling for standardisation of roading requirements for construction equipment. The new CECE president, Niklas Nillroth, held a high-level meeting at the European Commission (EC) highlighting the importance of legal proposals for EU harmonisation of road use requirements on mobile machinery. Nillroth pointed out on the unacceptable hole in the EU Single Market with national homologation systems that diverge, adding costs and administrative burdens for equipment manufacturers. CECE says it is requesting reassurances on the process of political validation for its proposal. Indeed, since the 2020 EC Work Programme did not include road circulation, concerns were being raised about raising awareness of the new EC’s political leadership on industry’s request to legislate in this area.

CECE highlighted the findings of a recent study commissioned by the EC to investigate the economic benefits from potential EU harmonisation. The sector’s compliance costs for road homologation - now standing at € 6 billion over a 10-year period, could be reduced by roughly 20% in case of EU harmonisation.

There is a need to solve an issue within the Single Market and there is strong push by industry as well as approval by Member States on this EU legislative action.

Different EU nations to have very different rules regarding roading requirements for construction machines. In some countries, wheeled machines can be used on road as long as they have suitable lights and are road registered with a licence plate. In others, special lighting systems may be required along with stickers showing the maximum speed of the vehicle. The maximum speed at which construction machines may be driven on road also varies across the EU. And perhaps most complex of all are the bewildering array of requirements relating to the use of truck cranes, rough terrain cranes and all-terrain cranes for road use.

Related Content

  • IPAF supports FEM position on use of cranes
    January 9, 2014
    IPAF supports the position paper issued by the Fédération Européenne de la Manutention (FEM) Product Group for Cranes and Lifting Equipment, which makes clear that tower cranes are designed and manufactured to lift loads, not people. The paper also highlights that cranes should not be used for entertainment purposes. Such rides will not be permitted at CONEXPO-CON/AGG.
  • CECE Summit 2020: a shift in mindset needed
    January 29, 2020
    Digitalisation and sustainability focused minds at the recent biennial CECE Summit in Brussels
  • Road safety concern for Europe
    May 19, 2015
    A quick look at corporate results for some of the major construction equipment manufacturers paints a somewhat confusing picture of current demand. Caterpillar, the world’s largest manufacturer of off-highway machines and for so long a bell-wether for the construction sector, recently released results showing a drop in profits. CNH and Volvo CE too have been similarly afflicted with a lower than expected financial performance, perhaps a major factor in Volvo CE's decision to pull out of a joint venture part
  • CECE and CISMA check machines’ compliance at INTERMAT
    January 6, 2017
    Experts checked 45 stands at INTERMAT and found that seven were exhibiting machines not compliant with European Union regulations. CECE, the Committee for European Construction equipment, and CISMA, the French association of construction machinery manufacturers, toured the stands before the opening of the show.