Skip to main content

Reauthorisation of US Federal Highway Programme

The Senate Environment & Public Works Committee in the US has approved a six-year reauthorisation of the federal highway programme. The move will be of major importance for the transportation construction industry, which has suffered from low levels of business in recent years. This six year package will provide a major stimulus to business for contractors and equipment firms alike, providing new jobs, as well as helping boost improvements to the US transportation network. The president of the American Roa
May 15, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
The Senate Environment & Public Works Committee in the US has approved a six-year reauthorisation of the federal highway programme.  The move will be of major importance for the transportation construction industry, which has suffered from low levels of business in recent years. This six year package will provide a major stimulus to business for contractors and equipment firms alike, providing new jobs, as well as helping boost improvements to the US transportation network. The president of the American Road Transportation & Builders Association (ARTBA), Pete Ruane, said the body is particularly pleased by the measure’s provisions to establish a dedicated freight program and to improve the transparency of how federal highway and bridge funds are utilised. These provisions will help focus federal resources on national economic needs and demonstrate to the American public the value they are receiving from investments in this area.

However, Ruane cautioned, “It is now time for members of the House and Senate leadership, and the respective tax committees, to get serious about addressing the Highway Trust Fund’s recurring revenue shortfall.  As this process moves forward, Congress needs to be clear there is nothing fiscally responsible about investment levels that fail to improve the conditions of the nation’s roads and bridges, or allow traffic congestion to get worse.  Furthermore, it is totally irresponsible to repeatedly march the Highway Trust Fund to the brink of insolvency.

“We stand ready to work with members of both parties to establish a permanent revenue mechanism to support future highway, bridge and public transportation programmes.”

Related Content

  • Funding the future for road development
    May 11, 2018
    Once again the spectre of future road funding has raised its ugly head. The US administration has announced plans for a massive redevelopment programme for its crumbling infrastructure network. However, as the American Road Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) has so succinctly pointed out in a recent report, how to pay for the work has yet to be established. This has been backed up by US transport expert Robert Poole of the Reason Foundation, as he recently commented, “…the way we fund and manage th
  • US infrastructure spending to benefit from state initiatives
    November 17, 2020
    US infrastructure spending looks set to benefit from state initiatives.
  • ARTBA: Up to 9,600 jobs at risk if Pennsylvania cuts transport works
    August 1, 2013
    Cutting highway and bridge work in the US state of Pennsylvania by 25% in any given year, and then sustaining it in future years, would cost the state US$1.25 billion in lost economic activity over a five-year period and put as many as 9,600 jobs permanently at risk, according to the American Road & Transportation Builders Association’s (ARTBA) chief economist. Dr. Alison Premo Black’s assessment of the impact of the potential impact of state-wide transport works cuts was part of her testimony to the Pennsy
  • ARTBA highlights US bridge issues
    May 10, 2016
    The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) is calling for more bridge repairs in the US. There are still too many structurally deficient bridges in the country according to a recent analysis. This report states that while there were 2,574 fewer structurally deficient bridges in 2015 compared to the number in 2014, there are still 58,500 on the structurally deficient list. Worse still, at the current pace of bridge investment it will take at least 21 years before these bridges are all r