Skip to main content

Ferry operators sink the financing plan for Fehmarn Belt link

The Court of Justice of the European Union has said Denmark’s state grant aid to the proposed Fehmarn Belt link is illegal under EU rules. The court noted that the European Commission approved the Fehmarn project’s financing – total cost likely around the €8.7 billion - in July 2015 without a formal procedure. Denmark is completely responsible for financing the project that will replace a ferry service. Part of the funds were to come through the European Union and its Connecting Europe Facility for tr
December 17, 2018 Read time: 3 mins
Fehmarn Belt financing: up in the air for undersea tunnel

The Court of Justice of the European Union has said Denmark’s state grant aid to the proposed Fehmarn Belt link is illegal under EU rules.

The court noted that the European Commission approved the Fehmarn project’s financing – total cost likely around the €8.7 billion - in July 2015 without a formal procedure.

Denmark is completely responsible for financing the project that will replace a ferry service. Part of the funds were to come through the European Union and its Connecting Europe Facility for transportation.

Ferry operators Scandlines and Stena Line which provide services between Europe and the Scandinavian peninsula, argued in the European Court that the grant level to be given to whichever company operating the toll structure is based on unrealistically high traffic volume predictions.

The Fehmarn Belt is a strait between the German island of Fehmarn and the Danish island of Lolland. Ferries connects the islands in the region. Completion of the €8.7 billion project has been set for 2028. However, even before the European Court ruling, the project’s approval process had been bogged down over environmental issues, especially within the German state of Schleswig-Holstein in which the southern end of 18km immersed tunnel will surface.

“We are satisfied with the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union. (…) Scandlines is not against a Fehmarn connection established with state aid. State aid may be necessary when completing such large-scale projects,” said Søren Poulsgaard Jensen, chief executive of Scandlines.

“However, we do expect correct procedure, which entails transparency and fair competition. The aid must therefore be accurately and realistically defined, and it must be based on consistent assumptions and safeguarded against abuse. It is decisive for us that the tunnel cannot use the state finances as its sees fit to impose taxpayer-financed price pressure when traffic volumes do not live up to the optimistic prognoses and the ferries appear competitive.”
 
The arguments are in line with Stena Line’s appeal which questioned the necessity of the aid, the duration of the aid and the undue distortion to the market by allowing the Fehmarn fixed link to dramatically reduce prices.

“In this case State aid has been granted illegally. That’s why we welcome the decision from the court to annul the aid granted by the Commission for the construction of the Fehmarn Belt connection,” said Claes Berglund, director public affairs and sustainability for Stena.

A Rambøll-Arup-TEC consultancy joint venture is engaged in a client consultancy services contract with 4782 Femern. The joint venture has also worked on other landmark infrastructure projects, including the Øresund Tunnel in Denmark, the City Tunnel in Malmö, Sweden, the Medway Tunnel in England, as well as underground rail systems in Amsterdam and Copenhagen.

8721 COWI is carrying out the detailed design of the tunnel (north tunnel section, south tunnel section, and ramps & portals). Meanwhile, 3392 SWECO is handling the design for the dredging and reclamation work.
 
A second framework contract, for technical support services to Femern, is being carried out by ÅF-Hansen & Henneberg.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Landmark ruling by European Commission says tolling existing highways is illegal
    April 25, 2012
    The European Commission has warned Portugal to change national rules on the introduction of tolling that are contrary to Community law, a decision that has widespread implications for similar schemes throughout the rest of Europe depending on how what is becoming a complex legal tangle is resolved. In November, 2010, the Aveiro municipality filed a formal complaint against the Portuguese Government to the European Commission objecting to a tolling scheme on the old SCUT highway. It argued that the system wa
  • The March of the Urban Low-emission Zone
    April 17, 2018
    Europe’s political patchwork is getting a low-emission zone overlap, according to Malcolm Kent* By now, pretty much everybody in the industry will be aware of the Low Emission Zone in London, UK. But awareness of similar European zones about to start or expand might be more patchy. The background to all of these schemes is the problem of air quality, particularly European Union rules setting limits on acceptable pollution levels. It was found some years ago that several member states’ cities, including
  • A rough ride for Denmark’s National Road Directorate
    November 1, 2019
    Denmark’s National Audit Office has criticised the Danish National Road Directorate for consistently miscalculating the level of investment required for road projects. The Road Directorate – Vejdirektoratet - used 33% less than budgeted for road projects from 2007-2017. The audit office said that "budget calculations by the transport ministry, including the Road Directorate, have not been accurate enough". Jens Holmboe, head of the Road Directorate, rejected the criticism, saying that the Audit Office
  • TISPOL 2017: Europe’s road safety record suffers as austerity bites hard
    December 21, 2017
    Police budgets are being slashed, staff numbers are falling and Europe’s long-term trend towards ever-fewer road deaths has ground to a halt. Does Europe’s road network face a far more dangerous future? Geoff Hadwick reports from TISPOL 2017 in Manchester, UK. Europe’s road safety record is under threat. Lower and lower funding levels have become a very serious, and very worrying, problem for the EU’s traffic police bosses. They know that they must find new ways to focus road users on changing their beha