Skip to main content

China to set up “international courts” for Belt and Road disputes

China plans to set up an “international court” for settling disputes among companies participating in Belt and Road transportation infrastructure work, according to Chinese media. The Global Time newspaper – with strong links to the communist government – reported that Chinese companies are facing more foreign-related lawsuits as they step up investment and business in countries covered by Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative. The report called Belt and Road “a brainchild of Xi”, referring to Xi Jinping
February 6, 2018 Read time: 3 mins
Big is best: the proposed 24km ShenZhong Link will connect the Chinese cities Shenzhen and Zhongshan in Guangdong province (photo courtesy DISSING + WEITLING architecture)

China plans to set up an “international court” for settling disputes among companies participating in Belt and Road transportation infrastructure work, according to Chinese media.

The Global Time newspaper – with strong links to the communist government – reported that Chinese companies are facing more foreign-related lawsuits as they step up investment and business in countries covered by Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative.

The report called Belt and Road “a brainchild of Xi”, referring to Xi Jinping, president of China and head of the Communist Party of China, the country’s government since the 1949 revolution.

Belt and Road, also known as The Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-century Maritime Silk Road, is a plan to build land and sea routes to and from China across Asia to Europe to facilitate trade. It was proposed Xi in 2013.

The so-called New Silk Road focuses mainly on infrastructure investment, construction materials, railway and highway, automobile, real estate, power grid and iron and steel.

The majority of projects are outside China but many internal projects are part of the strategy to improve logistics for the movement of goods internationally under the Belt and Road Initiative. Internal Chinese projects include the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao bridge tunnel complex now under construction and the proposed ShenZhong Link between Shenzhen and Zhongshan cities.

Last May, the Chinese government hosted a two-day summit in Beijing attended by 1,500 delegates from 130 countries, including 29 heads of state and government. Russian president Vladimir Putin and Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte were among the attendees. However, there were few European Union leaders or their representatives, according to a report in The Times newspaper in London.

The Times quoted Nick Marro, China analyst for the UK-based think tank Economist Intelligence Unit, voicing concern over financing for Belt and Road projects. “Major concerns remain regarding the transparency of how China is financing these projects and the extent to which China is able to manage security risks in [Belt and Road] countries,” he said.

The Times also reported on the size of the investments for infrastructure that could affect around 65% of the world’s population. China’s trade with countries across Asia and Southeast Asia exceeds US$1.4 trillion. But Beijing’s territorial disputes – mostly involving islands - in the South and East China Seas have fed suspicions that Belt and Road is a way for China to politically and economically effect countries that would agree to Chinese infrastructure investment.

The report of a so-called international court in China to settle disputes deriving from Belt and Road initiatives could be a way to dispel fears of undue Chinese influence. The Global Report noted that a prosed Belt and Road dispute settlement mechanism “is aimed at protecting both Chinese and foreign parties’ legal rights and interests and creating a stable, fair, transparent business environment with rule of law”.

The court would be based in Beijing and be comprised of three international commercial courts set up by the Supreme People’s Court in the cities of Xi’an, Shenzhen and Beijing.

The Global Report said that official data showed Chinese investment in 59 countries covered by the Belt and Road initiative totalled $14.4 billion in 2017, roughly the same as the previous year but down from the record $18.5 billion in 2015.

Related Content

  • India’s IRTE wins top Prince Michael of Kent Safety Award
    July 4, 2019
    India’s Institute of Road Traffic Education (IRTE) was among the international winners at the annual Prince Michael International Road Safety Awards in London. IRTE picked up the Premier Award for its road injury prevention programme and for being a key partner in the Safer Cars for India project established by Global NCAP, an independent certification body that evaluates the safety of vehicles. Part of IRTE’s strategy has been the setting up of what is believed to be Asia’s first Masters of Science i
  • Construction of Fehmarn Belt Link could start in 2019
    February 27, 2018
    Construction of a Fehmarn Belt Link could start a year from now – more than a year ahead of schedule, according to Danish media reports. The timing was put forward by Holger Schou Rasmussen, chairman of Femernbælt Development, and Kristian Pihl Lorenzen, the Liberal Party spokesman for traffic issues. They reportedly said that a pending environmental court case in Germany that has stalled approval by German authorities won’t hold up construction of the 18km crossing as much as had been feared. As late as
  • A new event is preparing the asphalt industry for tomorrow’s world
    September 11, 2018
    An inaugural event for the European bitumen industry urged attendees to look to the future - Kristina Smith reports What will tomorrow’s roads look like? Will lanes be narrower, will the road charge vehicles as they drive on them, will they collect data, will they be self-cleaning and de-polluting? All these questions and more were pondered at a two-day conference in Berlin, entitled ‘Preparing the asphalt industry for the future’. It was the first such event for Eurasphalt & Eurobitume (E&E), and set a
  • Australia bites the bullet on roads reform
    August 2, 2012
    Predictions of impending doom for Australia's roads infrastructure have given the nation's governments and roads stakeholders the fright they needed to collaborate on roads policy. If the latest initiatives Australia is putting in place do produce the full extent of the roads reform required, there will be some lessons there for the whole world Whether through pride or stubbornness, or a combination of both, each state and territory of Australia has always liked to do things its own way. To some extent and