Skip to main content

Sandvik makes strategic Chinese acquisition

Sandvik Mining and Construction has bought Shanghai Jianshe Luqiao Machinery Co (SJL), a major Chinese manufacturer of crushing and screening equipment, which sells its products under the SHANBAO brand.
May 2, 2012 Read time: 4 mins
325 Sandvik Mining and Construction has bought Shanghai Jianshe Luqiao Machinery Co (SJL), a major Chinese manufacturer of crushing and screening equipment, which sells its products under the 4897 Shanbao brand. Following the move the Shanbao name will be retained and this will be used as a mid-price brand alongside the premium Sandvik range. Changes are happening within the Sandvik Group also with the Mining and Construction business being split in two and from January 1st 2012 and SJL will become part of the new 2403 Sandvik Construction business area. The move will also see Sandvik Construction having two headquarters, one in Europe and one in China and this is also the first step in Sandvik developing a multi-brand approach with the return of some high profile names to the market.

The strategic acquisition of SJL will allow Sandvik to target a broader range of customers in developing nations and the Shanbao brand will be sold into fast growing markets where many customers favour mid-priced but quality brands. The Shanbao range and the SJL manufacturing facilities will benefit from Sandvik’s technical input, while Sandvik will benefit from SJL’s strong share of the Chinese market. Thomas Schulz, president construction and senior vice president of Sandvik Mining and Construction said, “Shanbao is the leading crushing and screening equipment manufacturer in China.”

He continued, “The owners of SJL were the power company Shanghai Electric with 75% and contractor China Road and Bridge with 25%. We have a joint venture agreement with Shanghai Electric, which retains 20% of SJL while Sandvik holds 80%.”

The reason for the acquisition is clear. The Chinese crushing and screening equipment has seen growth of 10%/year in the last five years and is expected to grow 2-3 times over the next five years according to Schulz. Competition is strong in China, with around 100 local firms active in the market, but this deal will benefit both SJL and Sandvik. Schulz explained that while SJL will gain from Sandvik’s technical and manufacturing technology, the management of the company will however remain Chinese and the firm will be headed by Thomas Zhang. “Shanbao will become the largest mid-market crushing and screening supplier in the world,” Zhang said. “The Shanbao brand has a very strong reputation in this market.

The deal took time to gestate, though Schulz explained that the parties involved saw the potential benefits and all were keen to make the SHANBAO brand successful globally. Sandvik has been successful in developing lines of mid-priced hydraulic breakers and drilling rigs, which share the quality and many mechanical and hydraulic components of the sophisticated electronically controlled products, but without the advanced systems. Schulz said that while Sandvik is a leader in the premium brand crushing and screening sector, it recognised some time ago that it needed a mid-priced product range to tap into developing markets in countries such as China and Brazil. Schulz said that developing a suitable range in-house would have taken too long and been too costly and that in this instance, buying the proven Shanbao range offered a more effective entry into the market. “It’s not a secret that the mid-priced market is growing faster than the premium brand market.”

Because of this strength in the mid-priced crushing and screening machine market and also because of the good reputation of the Shanbao brand, Sandvik is keen to retain the name and the value it adds to the deal. Schulz said that while Sandvik’s engineers will provide input to SJL, SJL for its part will give Sandvik the benefit of its understanding of the mid-priced crushing and screening market. The two brands will be kept separate though and Sandvik personnel will not market Shanbao machines while the SJL team will not market those from Sandvik.

Sandvik will help SJL improve the reliability of the Shanbao products and will also give assistance in developing SJL’s product support. However Schulz added, “We are strong believers that such a transformation can only occur with Chinese managers at the company.”

The target for Sandvik’s growth worldwide is 9% but both Schulz and Zhang believe that SJL will see a faster expansion rate based on the strength of the Chinese market as well as that of other developing countries.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Purchase Enables Ammann to Build on Strong ABG Brand
    June 10, 2024
    Ammann Group has finalised its acquisition of the ABG paving product line from Volvo Construction Equipment.
  • How bitumen technology solutions are solving paving problems around the world
    March 2, 2017
    This month we hear how additives can bring RAP back from the dead and fight the ravages of salt damage, how pellets reach parts that PMB can’t and how Shell and WeedsWest are expanding their respective businesses - Kristina Smith writes
  • Optimised machines improve aggregate production
    February 27, 2012
    Improving aggregate production and quality levels is not just about investing in the latest equipment but making sure existing machines are optimised - Claire Symes reports. Although the cost of fuel has dropped since last summer's high, reducing the cost/tonne of production is still high on the agenda for most quarry operators, along with improving quality.
  • Construction future for CEA
    July 18, 2012
    The UK’s Construction Equipment Association plays a key role in Europe - Mike Woof writes The UK’s Construction Equipment Association (CEA) is playing an important role within Europe, for manufacturers, customers and also for the wider benefit of industry as a whole. One important project where the CEA is closely involved with other sister organisations within the pan-European organisation CECE is with the rationalisation of machine regulations. Requirements were supposed to have been harmonised in 1992, an