Skip to main content

Kapsch for Kekava Bypass

By David Arminas March 6, 2024 Read time: 3 mins
The nearly 18km-long bypass is part of the A7 Bauska Highway, one of Latvia’s busiest roads with an average daily traffic volume of 17,000 vehicles (image © Renars Koris/Latvian State Roads - LVC, Latvijas Valsts Celi)

The Ķekava Bypass - Latvia's first "high-speed road" - opened in October and with it a traffic management system from Kapsch TrafficCom started operation.

The bypass is providing an efficient alternative for motorists travelling between the Latvian capital Riga, on the Baltic Sea, and neighbouring Lithuania to the south. Traffic in the small town of Ķekava is now being reduced.

Meanwhile, Kapsch TrafficCom's cameras, sensors and radar systems, as well as a modern and flexible traffic management software platform are contributing significantly to safety and sustainability along the bypass. "The Ķekava project is not only a milestone for road PPPs [public-private partnerships] and traffic in Latvia, but a testament to the positive influence of state-of-the-art technology on road safety," said Marko Frank, mobility expert and regional sales director at Kapsch TrafficCom.

The nearly 18km-long bypass is part of the A7 Bauska Highway, one of Latvia’s busiest roads with an average daily traffic volume of 17,000 vehicles and up to more than 25,000 at peak periods. The bypass is also designated part of pan-European TEN-T network called route E67 - the Via Baltica (Helsinki – Tallinn–Riga–Panevežys–Kaunas–Warsaw–Prague).

Construction of the €250 million bypass started in 2021 on what is the first highway in Latvia designated a high-speed road; pedestrians, cyclists and slow-moving agricultural vehicles are prohibited. However, pedestrians and cyclists are allowed on the parallel roads.

Kapsch TrafficCom technologies will ensure safe and efficient operation of the Ķekava Bypass for the next 20 years, noted Juris Frīdmanis, general manager of the private partner consortium Kekava ABT. It is monitored 24 hours per day thanks to more than 20 video surveillance cameras, two weather stations, traffic counting sensors, as well as data system analysing the traffic flow. Maximum driving speed on the bypass during the summer has been set at 120kph but reduced to 90kph during winter - October 16 to April 15.

According to the client, the state-owned road management agency Latvian State Roads (LVC, Latvijas Valsts Celi) there are 900 lighting fixtures, 40km of steel and 4km of concrete safety barriers. Noise mitigation solutions such as noise barriers and soil embankments have been implemented along 7.5km of the road as well as 27km of animal fencing.

Innovative materials and technologies have been used in the construction of the bypass. For example, culverts, water drainage pipes and lighting poles made of glass fibre have been used, recycled PET bottles have been used in the production of bridge barriers and sound absorbers made of wood fibre are used in noise barriers.

The consortium Kekava ABT consists of the Luxembourg-based infrastructure fund TIIC 2 S.C.A. SICAR as well as Latvian construction firms AS A.C.B. and CBR SIA Binders. Ķekava Bypass is the first major PPP project in road construction in the Baltics to be implemented according to the design-build-finance-operate model.

The most important criterion in the evaluation of submitted bids was the price, according to LVC. The price aspect had 80% of the overall project cost evaluation, while the remaining 20% covered compliance with various criteria, such as the duration of works, traffic organisation during the works, organisation of routine maintenance, quality and risk management.

Kekava ABT will guarantee that for another five years after the expiry of the PPP contract – 23 years from construction start – the Ķekava Bypass will remain in sufficiently good shape that it will require only daily maintenance works and no capital investment.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • IRF recommends action for greener roads
    July 4, 2012
    IRF's 2nd International Conference on Roads and Environment reveals how to make roads greener, cleaner and healthier, and follows through with action recommendations IRF's Conference in Geneva on 10-11 November, 2008 put three issues in sharp focus: innovative materials to save energy and other resources, inspiring solutions for water management; an integrated approach to noise and air pollution; and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions monitoring, accounting and offsetting. Some 140 delegates from 36 countries l
  • Proven safety barrier installation practices
    June 27, 2013
    Barrier selection criteria should pay close attention to risks for stretches of road as well as regulations. Roadways need to have barriers to provide passive protection for users and to reduce the risk of injury or death in the event of a vehicle leaving the roadway. A wide array of regulations and legislation covers the design and installation of barriers on Europe’s roads. However, there are still a number of loopholes for certain types of roadside protection and further agreement is required to close th
  • Europe’s roads are safer, but concerns continue
    July 16, 2019
    New data shows that Europe’s rural roads have seen a major improvement in safety levels. For the 2010 to 2017 period, road deaths on rural roads decreased more quickly than those for urban roads. Urban road safety is now becoming a key concern. Of particular concern for urban traffic is the high casualty rate amongst vulnerable road users (VRUs), which represent around 70% of those being killed. Pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists still face unacceptably high risks of being killed or seriously injured o
  • Spain’s international road safety show and conference proves successful
    November 8, 2013
    The 13th TRAFIC International Road Safety and Equipment Exhibition Fair in Madrid is said to have been a major success. Run recently by IFEMA at FERIA DE MADRID, the event attracted 110 exhibitors and 4,432 trade visitors according to the show organiser. In terms of trade visitor profile, 28% were from the various public administrations, 19% were from engineering and consultancy companies, and 6% from state security bodies. Most of the participating companies consulted agreed that although visitor numbers w