Skip to main content

Swiss pressure groups attack NAF road funding plan

Road transport pressure groups in Switzerland have criticised the Government's draft report on NAF, a national-road and agglomeration fund. While they are in favour of the general idea of the fund and its purpose, they reject details, like the plan for raising the mineral oil tax by either CHF 0.12 (€0.10) or CHF 0.15. They pointed to their initiative for making all funds generated with the mineral oil tax available to transport projects. The groups say that parliament and the people should decide on NAF an
May 13, 2014 Read time: 1 min
Road transport pressure groups in Switzerland have criticised the Government's draft report on NAF, a national-road and agglomeration fund. While they are in favour of the general idea of the fund and its purpose, they reject details, like the plan for raising the mineral oil tax by either CHF 0.12 (€0.10) or CHF 0.15. They pointed to their initiative for making all funds generated with the mineral oil tax available to transport projects. The groups say that parliament and the people should decide on NAF and their initiative at the same time. The pressure groups also said that they reject higher road transport fees. They say that the necessary projects can already be financed with the existing fees.

Related Content

  • Risk management hinders Estonian projects
    May 9, 2022
    A National Audit Office report noted poor documentation of the work that had been completed and why it was later changed.
  • Russian road tax plan
    March 5, 2012
    The Russian Government looks set to draft new laws covering funding of the road network.
  • Concrete testing - defining standards
    February 13, 2012
    Concrete is a versatile construction product, but it must be tested to make sure that it is fit for purpose
  • US president-elect Obama and the future of America's roads
    July 18, 2012
    The current US transportation funding law expires in September 2009. The current law allocates US$286 billion to highway and transportation projects. However, simply re-authorising the same amount will not be sufficient to build, maintain and improve the nation's roads, bridges, airports, and other deteriorating infrastructure. The backlog of projects unaddressed has swollen to the point where the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) says it will take $1.6 trillion to address the country's road and in