Skip to main content

Performance probe for National Highways

A report published last July concerning England's National Highways agency noted several risk areas where problems could arise and which have now done so, according to UK media reports.
By David Arminas February 21, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
England’s Strategic Road Network that takes in motorways and some major A-class highways – a total of 7,240km (© Jonathan Mitchell/Dreamstime)

England’s National Highways agency is being investigated because “performance has dipped in a number of areas”, the independent regulator Office of Rail and Road announced.

A report published last July noted several risk areas where problems could arise and which have now done so, according to UK media reports. These surround the delivery of major schemes and management of road assets under the five-year plan RIS2 – Road Investment Strategy 2, launched in 2020.

According to UK media, the ORR sent a letter to the National Highways chief customer and strategy officer Elliot Shaw, outlining the concerns of the ORR.

“Whilst each individual item of concern is potentially manageable, the number and breadth of our concerns, the repetitive nature of many concerns, and the proximity to the end of the road period, means that we consider that a more formal approach to assessing National Highways’ performance is now appropriate.”

The letter went on to emphasise that this investigation “is about understanding how National Highways is learning lessons and embedding them in its approach to delivering the RIS. It is not necessarily about resolving individual items”.

The agency manages England’s Strategic Road Network that takes in motorways and some major A-class highways – a total of 7,240km. The SRN is the most heavily used part of England’s roads, carrying a third of all traffic and two-thirds of all freight, according to the agency.

Upon its launch, RIS2 committed the central government to spend €32.02 billion (US$34.5 billion) on building new roads as well as road improvements to “reduce the negative impacts of the existing SRN” and “make the network safer, more reliable and more sensitive to the places through which it runs”.

The Lower Thames Crossing and the Stonehenge Tunnel are among the major projects that the agency wished to start by 2025. But due to planning hold-ups, the schemes have been moved forward to what will be RIS3, the next funding regime up to 2030.

The ORR will consider whether National Highways is meeting its performance target metrics and if it has done enough to reach them. Despite the investigation, though, ORR has said that National Highways has achieved many of its aims and delivered improved roads.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Karpaty Tunnel value-for-money scrutinised
    May 19, 2023
    The planned 12km Karpaty Tunnel under the Lesser Carpathian mounts of Slovakia is again being questioned as the government awaits an environmental impact assessment.
  • Arup and Ramboll partners for Highways England
    July 17, 2020
    Arup and Ramboll have a partnership deal for Highways England.
  • ARTBA warns of shortfall in funding for US highways
    February 14, 2014
    According to the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA), fixing the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) without generating any new revenue will be highly challenging. ARTBA president Pete Ruane told a Senate panel that such a move would require the equivalent of the US Congress passing and the president signing a 2013-level Murray-Ryan budget deal every year. And this would be sufficient just to maintain current highway and transit programme investment levels. According to a new Congressional Bud
  • US road safety suggestions
    February 12, 2018
    The US needs to up its game on road safety, which a new report can help with, providing key steps state governors can take to help reduce road crash risks. The report has been published by the National Governors Association (NGA) and is titled, “State Strategies to Reduce Highway and Traffic Fatalities and Injuries: A Road Map for States.” The publication emphasises the key role of governors in improving road safety. It suggests ways to improve coordination and strengthen existing efforts across state