Skip to main content

Mobile LiDAR equipment working in Pennsylvania

Michael Baker International completed a US$7 million project for the US state of Pennsylvania collecting nearly 20 million data fields from over 8,600 traffic signals During the year-long project, the engineering, planning and consulting business worked with PennDOT’s Traffic Signal Asset Management System. It collected nearly 20 million data fields for each of the 8,623 traffic signals analysed. The data has populated a centralised database to support PennDOT’s planning, design, maintenance and oper
February 6, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Michael Baker International completed a US$7 million project for the US state of Pennsylvania collecting nearly 20 million data fields from over 8,600 traffic signals

During the year-long project, the engineering, planning and consulting business worked with 4907 PennDOT’s Traffic Signal Asset Management System. It collected nearly 20 million data fields for each of the 8,623 traffic signals analysed.

The data has populated a centralised database to support PennDOT’s planning, design, maintenance and operational decision-making.

“Pennsylvania is unique in that its traffic signals are owned and maintained by Commonwealth [state] municipalities and not PennDOT, which has resulted in varying standards of maintenance and operation care from municipality-to-municipality,” said Steve Barber, vice president and Harrisburg office executive for Michael Baker International.

Michael Baker team employed its mobile Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-equipped vans to efficiently collect all necessary data. Since all LiDAR data was collected at the intersections, PennDOT can now review data on other non-signal infrastructure assets at the intersections.

In 2013, Pennsylvania passed Act 89 that calls for an additional $2.4 billion funding over five years. PennDOT identified traffic signals as an area of necessary investment for this spend.

PennDOT established the Green Light-Go programme to manage the dedicated traffic signal funding and corresponding maintenance and operations projects. A by-product of this programme was implementation of the Traffic Signal Asset Management System, for which Michael Baker led the data collection through coordination with the PennDOT Central Office and each of their engineering districts.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The GRSF: breaking down barriers
    December 17, 2020
    Improving road safety can be expensive, especially for low- to middle-income countries. The Global Road Safety Facility has been working hard to alleviate the situation
  • Eradicating work zone danger
    June 26, 2013
    New safety systems for highway work zones are helping to reduce deaths and injuries in the United States, while much work is being done in Europe to improve work zone safety. Guy Woodford reports. With more road building underway than at any one time in Texas history, the US Lone Star state’s Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is introducing its first highway safety system with queue-warning technology and temporary rumble strips to cut work zone collisions. Debuting along a central Texas stretch of the
  • Make the case for electronic tolling, ASECAP conference delegates heard
    September 14, 2015
    Mobility pricing and electronic tolling is the future, delegates to a recent ASECAP Study Days conference, reports Geoff Hadwick at the Lisbon event. The international road tolling industry is failing to make its case and the sector is losing out to other social and political lobby groups. As a result, “tolling is still on the sidelines”, according to the head of the Washington-based International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association. IBTTA chief executive Pat Jones issued his stark warning at the
  • Adaptive signal control report
    April 30, 2012
    A study of McCain’s QuicTrac adaptive control software, deployed over a year ago by the Californian city of Temecula, has highlighted the array of benefits achievable through an adaptive system. The survey calculated the arterials’ level of service, measured in delay per vehicle, both pre- and post-deployment, evaluating the systems’ benefit-to-cost ratio and environmental impact.