Briefly, and to the point

Duplex A86 tunnel. The low risk found for driving through the tunnel is primarily due to the low volume of traffic of around 11,000 vehicles/day and the ban on HGVs and the transport of hazardous goods.
April 10, 2012 Read time: 4 mins
The Hvalfjordur Tunnel in Iceland gained EuroTAP's poorest test result. Plans for a new tube have been hit by the financial crisis. (EuroTAP, Johann Kristjansson, photographer)

The low risk found for driving through the tunnel is primarily due to the low volume of traffic of around 11,000 vehicles/day and the ban on HGVs and the transport of hazardous goods.

Unidirectional traffic, sufficiently wide lanes, emergency lanes and lighting are the main reasons for the very good result for preventive measures.

The tunnel is monitored around-the-clock in a tunnel control centre manned by trained staff, and incidents are automatically reported to the control centre by video link. If necessary, motorists are guided using traffic lights and variable traffic signs, and information is provided via information displays, traffic radio and loudspeakers.

An automatic fire alarm system detects fires, activates ventilation, and closes the tunnel, and the short distance to be covered by the fire brigade, the stationary fire sprinkler system and the supply of fire-fighting water in the tunnel ensures effective fire fighting.

An emergency response plan and regular drills ensure good cooperation between the tunnel control centre and the emergency services.

In the event of fire, there are good preconditions for effective self-rescue. The ventilation system extracts the smoke near the seat of the fire out of the tunnel. This means that people in the tube can use the well-signposted emergency exits to the neighbouring tube in order to leave the tunnel through a largely smoke-free environment.

Escape shafts for tunnel evacuation are provided every 1,000m.

Duplex A86 2436 EuroTAP rating: very good, best test result
Location: France, near Paris, between Rueil Malmaison and Vaucresson (access A13)
Year opened: 2009 (first stage of construction)
Length: 4,530m
Portal height level: 173/17m above sea level
Number of tubes: two, unidirectional traffic
Speed limit: 70km/hour
Vehicles per day: 11,000
Share of HGVs: 0 (banned) Breakdowns/accidents/fires: 28/0/0 Risk: LowHvalfjörður Tunnel

The medium risk found for driving through the tunnel is primarily due to its 5,770m length and steep gradient of more than 8%, although the traffic volume of 5,400 vehicles and number of hazardous goods transports each day are rather low.

Preventive measures are acceptable, at least with a view to the structure, and primarily comprise sufficiently wide lanes and lay-bys. However, lighting is too weak, and while the tunnel is monitored around the clock in a tunnel control centre manned by trained staff, however, video surveillance is incomplete.

Incidents in the tunnel are not automatically reported to the tunnel control centre. Tunnel staff rely on reports made by motorists using either the emergency (or their own mobile) phones. If necessary, motorists are guided using traffic lights and variable traffic signs and information is provided on displays and traffic radio.

Hvalfjörður Tunnel (EuroTAP rating: very poor, poorest test result)
Location:Iceland, near Akranes, Highway No. 1 between Reykjavik and Akranes
Year opened: 1998
Length: 5,770m
Portal height level: 10/20m above sea level
Number of tubes: one (bi-directional traffic)
Speed limit: 70km/hour
Vehicles per day: 5,400
Share of HGVs: 5%
Breakdowns/accidents/fires: 26/8/0
Risk: MediumThere is no automatic fire alarm system, and if a fire breaks out the tunnel control centre must activate the ventilation system manually, close the tunnel and notify the fire brigade, which has to travel a long distance. This, and the insufficient supply of fire-fighting water with just one hydrant in the middle of the tunnel, makes fire-fighting difficult. At least, an emergency response plan coordinates cooperation between the tunnel control centre and emergency services. Emergency drills are not held regularly.

The preconditions for effective self-rescue in a fire badly need to be improved. Due to the long ventilation section along the entire length of the tunnel, smoke located a long distance from the seat of the fire cannot be prevented from sinking down from the tunnel ceiling.

Moreover, longitudinal flow in the tunnel is not considered in ventilation control. The steep gradient in the tunnel also encourages smoke to spread. This can lead to smoke spreading throughout the entire tunnel and, considering the lack of additional emergency exits and the hence long distances to be covered to the portals, this could be dangerous. Orientation in a fire is also difficult because these escape routes are not marked by evacuation lighting.
Highway & Network Management

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Helsinki's tunnel project
    May 9, 2012
    A novel approach to utilities installation will lengthen the life of Helsinki's streets, reports Mike Woof. A major utilities project in Finnish capital Helsinki will offer huge benefits for the city's streets and traffic flow rates in years to come. A new tunnel system is being excavated under Helsinki for the power company Helsingin Energia, although this will be co-owned by the city. Called the Common Utility Tunnel (Meilahti-Pasilak-Käpylä LU2), the excavations form an extensive network spreading out un
    Read More
  • Defective eyesight, a road safety concern?
    February 16, 2012
    Failing eyesight presents safety problems for Europe's older drivers. A new report highlights substantial variation in the assessment of drivers' vision across Europe, and recommends that Member States make moves to better assess drivers' vision. Checking the vision of drivers plays a valuable role in the EU's target of halving road deaths across the EU by 2020. The aim is to achieve this road safety improvement by legislative means that change driver behaviour, raise the technical standards of vehicles and
    Read More
  • Driverless vehicles -safe at any speed?
    May 22, 2018
    The development of driverless vehicles is ongoing, with manufacturers in the US, Europe, Japan, South Korea and China all working on various projects. But as the recent pedestrian fatality involving a driverless car under test in Arizona highlights, safety is not entirely assured. One key problem is that the road environment is not straightforward and self-driving vehicles have to share roadspace with vehicles under human control. However, human behaviour is not easy to predict. Nor is there one mode of beh
    Read More
  • Oklahoma opts for IRD’s electronic truck screening system
    September 30, 2016
    In a US$2.59 million contract, Dynamics (IRD) is to build, implement and maintain a port-of-entry (POE) electronic screening system for commercial vehicles in the US state of Oklahoma.
    Read More

Highlighted Content