Skip to main content

Concern over glass bead quality grows

Further evidence is emerging of the potential risks of glass beads used for road markings supplied by Chinese firms.
March 1, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
Further evidence is emerging of the potential risks of glass beads used for road markings supplied by Chinese firms.

A new study by Rowan University in the US has reaffirmed that the glass beads contain high levels of arsenic and lead.

The three year study was funded by the 2555 New Jersey Department of Transportation and is said to be definitive on the subject, according to American Glass Bead Manufacturers' Association. There has been concern over the quality and safety of Chinese supplied glass for some time and the new study by the New Jersey Institute of Technology/Rowan University offers definitive evidence that a growing number of imported glass beads for highway markings exhibit high concentrations of heavy metals and are susceptible to rapid leaching. The three-year study reaffirms prior research work which has shown that imported glass beads can have high levels of arsenic and lead and were quickly susceptible to leaching with exposure to ground water and normal environmental conditions. "The findings from this exhaustive study solidify all the previous research and are consistent with a recent Texas A&M University 2347 Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) study," said Robert McClune, president of the American Glass Bead Manufacturers' Association. "They also confirm what our membership has known to be true for quite some time." The Rowan University study revealed significant concentrations of heavy metals and leached concentrations were found to exceed the water quality criteria of New Jersey. The study said protective limits should be set for total concentrations in glass beads at 100ppm for arsenic and 100ppm for lead.

The trade group notes that glass beads manufactured by companies in emerging nations, particularly China, continue to use glass made from old glass-making techniques which require chemical modification resulting in products containing high levels of arsenic and lead. In comparison, US producers use environmentally-friendly materials such as recycled flat glass to make their glass beads which do not contain high levels of arsenic and lead. These glass bead products are primarily used for highway safety markings, providing the light-reflective lane markings found on highways around the world. "Based on the scientific evidence, the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) study, and now the results from the New Jersey Institute of Technology/Rowan University study, it's time for state and federal transportation officials and lawmakers to act and establish a standard for engineered glass beads in highway markings and prevent these hazardous substances from being applied to our roads and highways," said McClune. Over the past several years, the association has worked diligently to raise awareness of the issue, citing the need to hold all manufacturers to higher quality standards that protect the environment and highway worker safety by avoiding the use of products that contain hazardous materials. Setting a heavy metals standard for glass beads has gained strong support from environmental groups like the Sierra Club, state and federal lawmakers, and unions like the International Union of Operating Engineers. Through the efforts of the association, a total of 21 states have now adopted laws or regulations that set limits for heavy metals content in glass beads used on highway markings.

In the last month, West Virginia and Maryland have adopted contract specifications that limit the level of arsenic and lead in glass beads for highway markings. The focus on avoiding the utilization of glass beads containing hazardous materials is intensifying globally with the 1116 European Union, Australia, New Zealand, and several Canadian provinces already setting similar standards. China, a major source of these questionable glass beads, has also set strict heavy metal standards for internal use but continues to export contaminated glass bead products to other nations, including the US, according to the association.

Related Content

  • Road markings important for road safety
    February 20, 2012
    Manufacturers are constantly upgrading marking materials and equipment. Now those responsible for highways are being asked to do more as Patrick Smith reports. A recent report claimed that nearly one-third of the length of Britain's single carriageway A-roads have white lines so worn out that they do not meet recognised standards. According to the LifeLines Report, an assessment of more than 2,400km of the road network, Britain's most dangerous roads have the most worn-out centre line markings of all, leavi
  • IRF promotes education and career development for road industry entrants
    February 27, 2012
    The Fellowship Orientation and Executive Leadership Program of the Washington Program Center is now the IRF Road Scholar Program. It encompasses the ten-day Fellows' Orientation Program, the Executive Leadership workshop, and the brand new IRF career fair. This year, 25 students from 19 countries participated, bringing the 59-year-old program total to 1,180.
  • High marks for road marking solutions
    December 3, 2013
    A novel solution based on a leading road marking manufacturer’s proven marking technology is keeping elderly residents safe in a French residential development. Guy Woodford reports on this and other major road marking products and their applications By 2050, it is estimated that 45% of European Union citizens will be over 60. Many authorities have been working to develop and implement safety standards that will ensure enhanced mobility for their local elderly population. As part of their implementation,
  • Balanced Mix Design in the US could revolutionise pavement design and testing
    April 30, 2018
    Roads in the US keep failing so the Federal Highways Authority is proposing a new approach to mix design, but what does this mean for tests and testing? - Kristina Smith reports How do you test an asphalt mix for rutting? In the US, the answer could be any one of several tests, depending on which State you are in: Asphalt Pavement Analyser, Flow Number, Hamburg Wheel Tracking Test, Superpave Shear Test or Triaxial Stress Sweep Test. But that could all change. The Federal Highways Agency (FHWA), part of