Skip to main content

Need for defined work zone safety regulations

Christophe Nicodème, ERF's Director General, explores a missing link in the road safety chain Road works are an essential part of the work of public administrations and toll operators; aimed at preserving a safe road infrastructure for users, while minimising the disruption caused as a result of unavoidable traffic interventions. Given the essential role of road works, one would assume that well-defined regulations exist at national and European level to determine the best way of conducting them. Yet
April 12, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
Besides congestion, typical work zones can cause dangerous confusion, putting both drivers and workers at risk

Christophe Nicodème, ERF's Director General, explores a missing link in the road safety chain

Road works are an essential part of the work of public administrations and toll operators; aimed at preserving a safe road infrastructure for users, while minimising the disruption caused as a result of unavoidable traffic interventions.

Given the essential role of road works, one would assume that well-defined regulations exist at national and European level to determine the best way of conducting them.

Yet, in reality, this is one of the least regulated fields of the road sector. At national level, regulations tend to be rather vague and, in most cases, road works are awarded essentially on the basis of the cheapest offer rather than with due regard to an optimal safety/mobility scenario. This absence of clear rules at national level has made any thought of harmonisation at European level practically impossible.

As a result, work sites are characterised by high accident frequencies that place both drivers and workers at risk. By way of indication, the Dutch Institute for Road Safety Research (SWOV) has highlighted that 2% of all fatal accidents in the Netherlands occur in work zones.

Meanwhile, in the USA, 667 people were killed in work zones during 2009 alone!

In 2007, 1202 European Road Federation published a position paper entitled 'Safety on Motorway Work Zones - Works in Progress' (available for download from ERF website) that sought to identify some key parameters for ensuring a safer environment during maintenance operations.

In this respect, ERF notably called for better integration of safety parameters in public procurement procedures; better use of passive safety devices as a means of avoiding accidents and promoting a seamless flow of traffic; better signs and road markings to guide drivers entering, driving through and exiting work zones; and better awareness raising campaigns to highlight the dangers among road users and impress the need for greater enforcement.

The issue was revisited during the 16th 2462 IRF World Meeting in Lisbon [in 2010], where stakeholders gathered for a dedicated roundtable to discuss progress to date and the challenges that remain. The message that emerged was unequivocal: a lot more needs to be done in this field if we hope to achieve greater safety and mobility around work zones.

It is against this backdrop, and following consultations with ERF members, that I decided to launch a new Working Group on Work Zone Safety, which held its first meeting on 9 March, 2011 at the ERF offices in Brussels, Belgium.

Open to ERF members and external participants, the working group's initial objectives will be to examine the different requirements and solutions for work zones in terms of safety, mobility and the environment - as well as to perform a comparative analysis of existing norms at EU Member State level with a view to identifying best practices and examining the scope for greater harmonisation and standardisation.

I take this opportunity to extend a personal invitation to all stakeholders that have an interest in the field, and who would like to participate in this new Working Group, to contact the ERF Secretariat.

At the end of the day, the success of the Working Group will largely be determined by the breadth of its expertise, as well as the willingness of industry partners to implement its findings in collaboration with the relevant authorities.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • ERF aims to boost the voice of road infrastructure in EU research policy
    July 1, 2013
    As of 1 January 2014, the European Union's (EU's) next Multi-Annual Financial Framework for the period 2014–2020 will come into effect. One of the key components of this European strategy aimed at boosting competitiveness and increasing Europe’s innovation potential is the EU’s Strategic Framework for Research and Development called ‘Horizon 2020’. Recognising that without research and development, Europe cannot maintain the industrial leadership it currently holds in many areas, European leaders look set t
  • The AFB20 (2) Roadside Safety Sub-committee urges more cooperation
    November 17, 2015
    The AFB20 (2) Roadside Safety Sub-committee on International Research Activities calls for closer cooperation between road authorities and the industry On 15 September 2015, the AFB20 (2) Roadside Safety Sub-committee on International Research Activities held its third European workshop in Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Road markings and microplastics
    May 13, 2024
    Recent regulations from the European Commission have exempted road markings from microplastic bans and restrictions, at least for the moment, explains the ERF.
  • ERF participates in 4th Congress on Roads in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    December 8, 2014
    On 18th and 19th September, the Association of Consulting Engineers Bosnia and Herzegovina (UKI BH), a member of the ERF, organised its 4th Congress on Roads, together with the Regional Cooperation Council. The UKI BH brings together stakeholders involved in consulting activities aimed at supporting the companies’ interests and improving the efficiency of the activities developed according to the international rules and regulations. The Regional Cooperation Council promotes the reciprocal cooperation, as