Skip to main content

IRF calls for action on road traffic noise

IRF BPC calls for more effective implementation of Noise Reduction Maps According to the European Union Directive 2002/49/EC relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise (END), the Member States of the European Union have committed to abide by a strict timetable of milestones and deliverables, all aimed at reducing current levels of noise and improving the life of Europe's citizens. As part of this overall strategy, European leaders were required to submit national noise action plans by
July 12, 2012 Read time: 3 mins

IRF BPC calls for more effective implementation of Noise Reduction

According to the 1116 European Union Directive 2002/49/EC relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise (END), the Member States of the European Union have committed to abide by a strict timetable of milestones and deliverables, all aimed at reducing current levels of noise and improving the life of Europe's citizens.

As part of this overall strategy, European leaders were required to submit national noise action plans by 18 January of this year, targeting major roads and all agglomerations with more than 250,000 inhabitants. However, so far, only four Member States have submitted their plans.

Meanwhile, millions of citizens continue to be exposed on a daily basis to unacceptable levels of noise pollution. According to a report released by the European Union, about 40% of the population in EU countries is exposed to road traffic noise at levels exceeding 55 dB(A), and 20% is exposed to levels exceeding 65 dB(A) during daytime. More than 30% is exposed to levels exceeding 55 dB(A) during night time. These figures should be put in perspective with 3263 World Health Organisation guidelines for community noise, which stipulate less than 30 dB(A) during the night to enable good quality sleep, and less than 35 dB(A) in classrooms to ensure good teaching and learning conditions.

The Brussels Programme Centre (BPC) of the International Road Federation (IRF), representing some of the main stakeholders concerned by the application of END, has long acknowledged the societal impacts of its activities and, for this reason, is actively promoting measures to help fight noise and thus improve the quality of life of European citizens. In this respect, it naturally supports efforts implemented within the framework of the END Directive.

Nevertheless, as stated in its Position Paper of 27 April, entitled 'Effective Assessment Method for proposed Noise Reduction Solutions', the lack of a mandatory impact assessment mechanism to properly evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed measures, coupled with many Member States' willingness (particularly in the current economic climate) to opt for the cheapest rather than necessarily the most effective measures, risks jeopardising the success of this ambitious project, and may significantly limit the anticipated benefits for citizens.

Effective noise reducing devices do exist already. However, opting for the cheapest, or a 'one size fits all' solution will not only fail to bring down current levels of noise sufficiently, but may also cost more in the long run, given that corrective measures will most likely have to be taken at a later stage.

The IRF BPC urges all concerned stakeholders to demonstrate the necessary political will in order to bring about a genuine and long-lasting reduction of noise.  Further information at %$Linker: External 0 0 0 oLinkExternal [email protected] Nelson Bunn false http://[email protected]%20/ false false%>

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • International Transport Forum: public vs private policy debate
    December 4, 2014
    Simply banning cars in parts of major cities will not necessarily greatly improve the air quality over time, a new report has found. The answer for cutting carbon emissions is to get the right balance of private and public transportation along with infrastructure developed to sustain the mix, according to the International Transport Forum (ITF), a think tank within the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The ITF evaluated the potential impact of transport policies on urban carbon
  • University of Birmingham establishes training programme in parallel with IRF for senior road executives
    February 22, 2012
    The University of Birmingham's internationally renowned Highways Group links with IRF to host this year's premier Forum for Advances in Sustainable Roads, from 12 to 24 April, 2010. For over 15 years, the Senior Road Executives Programme (SRE) has provided continuing professional development for road practitioners
  • Road accident data management
    July 19, 2012
    IRF Geneva unveils a modern solution for road accident data management. This year's Intertraffic Amsterdam exhibition provided a high-profile backdrop for the launch of RADaR, a pioneering new tablet application developed to facilitate the on-site collection of precise and scientific accident data, primarily by traffic police. Introducing the application to an international audience gathered in the venue’s inaugural Smart Mobility Centre, IRF Geneva's director general, Sibylle Rupprecht, highlighted RADaR's
  • New strategies will help boost road safety worldwide
    November 4, 2013
    *Martin Heath, the Chair of the IRF Group of Experts working group on Engineering Measures for Infrastructure Safety, examines the expected impacts of the new ISO 39001 The excitement and enthusiasm generated by the 2011 launch of the Decade of Action for Road Safety is gradually receding amidst the gloom of an interminably slow global economic recovery. However, a fresh and challenging impetus is about to be given to international road safety management following the publication of a new quality management