Skip to main content

Improving safety barriers for motorcyclists

Delays to better barrier safety pose further risks for Europe's powered two wheeled riders. The issue of safety for powered two wheeler riders (PTWRs) is a matter of some debate in Europe. Although Europe's PTWRs make up a mere fraction of the vehicle population, they figure highly in accident statistics. Safety provisions could be improved using available technology but a recent political decision has downgraded the importance of such a move.
February 20, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
There are numerous products on the market designed to reduce the risk of motorcyclists impacting with barrier supports

Delays to better barrier safety pose further risks for Europe's powered two wheeled riders

The issue of safety for powered two wheeler riders (PTWRs) is a matter of some debate in Europe. Although Europe's PTWRs make up a mere fraction of the vehicle population, they figure highly in accident statistics. Safety provisions could be improved using available technology but a recent political decision has downgraded the importance of such a move.

The 2844 Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN) is the international body that makes standards for products in the European Union. CEN has safety amongst its remit, yet has turned a ready-to-be-voted guardrail standard into a technical paper, the use of which will be left to the discretion of each member state. And according to the 2845 Federation of European Motorcyclists' Associations (FEMA), in doing so CEN has missed a major opportunity to save motorcyclists' lives.

CEN's technical committee on road equipment held an annual meeting where the draft standard for motorcyclist protection systems was turned into a Technical Specification. Representatives from the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom, all voted to downgrade the draft standard. The issue is of note as it means many existing containment barriers, although designed to protect motorists, will continue to pose a threat to motorcycle riders.

Many barrier types in widespread use across Europe have been criticised by motorcycling groups such as FEMA. These barriers pose impact hazards for motorcyclists with the support posts in particular known to cause serious injury and death to fallen motorcyclists.

FEMA has been one of the organisations campaigning hard for the last three years for a change in the European safety regulations, which would require the support posts of barriers to be covered, particularly at known danger spots. FEMA's General Secretary, Aline Delhaye said, "What will be done with this Technical Specification is a mystery to me." The decision was made despite the proven safety benefits of the Spanish Standard on which EN1317-8 draft was based. Since Spain introduced its regulations for approved and protected guardrails and these units were installed, there have been no fatal or serious injury accidents resulting from fallen riders impacting against barrier supports.

In spite of this evidence, only Belgium, France, Italy, Norway, Portugal and Spain supported the proposal for a European Standard. FEMA says that it will continue working to improve safety for motorcyclists, in the face of political inactivity. FEMA also questions why member nations did not support the draft standard.

The financial cost of introducing safety measures would be comparatively small, as has been shown in Spain. This would be hugely outweighed by the savings in the human scale, as well as economically, by reducing the injury and fatality toll amongst motorcycle riders.

There are numerous proven products designed for use on highways to protect fallen motorcyclists from striking supporting posts on barriers and come from an array of suppliers. Products already in use in Spain and other European countries include those supplied by firms such as 2846 Basyc, 2847 Congost, 2848 Fracasso, 1529 Highway Care, 238 Industrias Duero, 272 Marcegaglia, 1263 Motoprotec, 333 Snoline and SCT.

Related Content

  • Promoting advances in sustainable roads worldwide
    February 8, 2012
    The International Road Federation (IRF), founded in 1948, is the only world forum advocating better and safer roads through better road design and construction bearing in mind the user. It is a unique institution that brings together members active in road infrastructure from both the private and public sectors.
  • Swedish slope barrier offers safe option
    December 3, 2014
    New barrier protection technologies can boost road safety – Mike Woof writes According to Swedish specialist Blue Systems, slope barriers can offer technical benefits in comparison with conventional side barriers. The firm says that moving the road barrier from the hard shoulder out into the embankment slope delivers a wider road without having to widen the carriageway. “It’s a very cost-efficient way of creating more space and raising road safety, there is no widening of hard shoulder required – just a sui
  • Aviva calls for tougher ‘crash for cash’ motor injury fraud sentencing
    June 18, 2014
    UK motor insurance firm Aviva has called for tougher custodial sentences for fraudulent 'slam-ons' – road traffic accidents deliberately caused in order to claim for whiplash compensation – which increased by 51% in the UK during 2013, according to Aviva’s claims fraud data. These induced accidents have a value of over €12.5 million (£10 million) and are at the highest levels ever detected by the insurer. In total, Aviva has over 6,000 motor injury claims linked to organised fraud activity and is calling f
  • Directive on road infrastructure safety management – to improve mobility safely
    September 12, 2018
    Better signs and more compliance leads to safer roads, says Christophe Nicodème, director general of the European Union Road Federation in the first of a regular new series of columns from ERF The Third Mobility Package launched by the European Commission represents the final piece of the “Europe on the Move Agenda” towards a modernisation of transport policy adapting to new decarbonisation and digitisation commitments. The package is composed of elements impacting various transport elements, among which