Skip to main content

Improving safety barriers for motorcyclists

Delays to better barrier safety pose further risks for Europe's powered two wheeled riders. The issue of safety for powered two wheeler riders (PTWRs) is a matter of some debate in Europe. Although Europe's PTWRs make up a mere fraction of the vehicle population, they figure highly in accident statistics. Safety provisions could be improved using available technology but a recent political decision has downgraded the importance of such a move.
February 20, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
There are numerous products on the market designed to reduce the risk of motorcyclists impacting with barrier supports

Delays to better barrier safety pose further risks for Europe's powered two wheeled riders

The issue of safety for powered two wheeler riders (PTWRs) is a matter of some debate in Europe. Although Europe's PTWRs make up a mere fraction of the vehicle population, they figure highly in accident statistics. Safety provisions could be improved using available technology but a recent political decision has downgraded the importance of such a move.

The 2844 Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN) is the international body that makes standards for products in the European Union. CEN has safety amongst its remit, yet has turned a ready-to-be-voted guardrail standard into a technical paper, the use of which will be left to the discretion of each member state. And according to the 2845 Federation of European Motorcyclists' Associations (FEMA), in doing so CEN has missed a major opportunity to save motorcyclists' lives.

CEN's technical committee on road equipment held an annual meeting where the draft standard for motorcyclist protection systems was turned into a Technical Specification. Representatives from the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom, all voted to downgrade the draft standard. The issue is of note as it means many existing containment barriers, although designed to protect motorists, will continue to pose a threat to motorcycle riders.

Many barrier types in widespread use across Europe have been criticised by motorcycling groups such as FEMA. These barriers pose impact hazards for motorcyclists with the support posts in particular known to cause serious injury and death to fallen motorcyclists.

FEMA has been one of the organisations campaigning hard for the last three years for a change in the European safety regulations, which would require the support posts of barriers to be covered, particularly at known danger spots. FEMA's General Secretary, Aline Delhaye said, "What will be done with this Technical Specification is a mystery to me." The decision was made despite the proven safety benefits of the Spanish Standard on which EN1317-8 draft was based. Since Spain introduced its regulations for approved and protected guardrails and these units were installed, there have been no fatal or serious injury accidents resulting from fallen riders impacting against barrier supports.

In spite of this evidence, only Belgium, France, Italy, Norway, Portugal and Spain supported the proposal for a European Standard. FEMA says that it will continue working to improve safety for motorcyclists, in the face of political inactivity. FEMA also questions why member nations did not support the draft standard.

The financial cost of introducing safety measures would be comparatively small, as has been shown in Spain. This would be hugely outweighed by the savings in the human scale, as well as economically, by reducing the injury and fatality toll amongst motorcycle riders.

There are numerous proven products designed for use on highways to protect fallen motorcyclists from striking supporting posts on barriers and come from an array of suppliers. Products already in use in Spain and other European countries include those supplied by firms such as 2846 Basyc, 2847 Congost, 2848 Fracasso, 1529 Highway Care, 238 Industrias Duero, 272 Marcegaglia, 1263 Motoprotec, 333 Snoline and SCT.

Related Content

  • Improving safety for cyclists
    November 29, 2013
    New systems in development for protecting vulnerable road users - Mike Woof writes In many European countries the number of people using bicycles for commuting are increasing. This is being actively encouraged by city authorities as it offers an effective way to reduce traffic congestion, lower exhaust emissions and also improve public health. The Netherlands and Denmark have long had high percentages of commuters opting to use bicycles and other European countries are looking to capitalise on the experienc
  • Portugal's road safety initiative
    April 12, 2012
    The Portuguese experience with road safety has proved that planning, development, introduction, and hard work do pay off in the end. Paulo Marques Augusto, president of the National Road Safety Authority (ANSR), explained that in the last 10 years a decrease of over 50% has been achieved in the number of fatalities on the road network despite a continuing growth in traffic demand (there are five million vehicles in Portugal), and a similar reduction in travel time on most of the connections between Lisbon a
  • The AFB20 (2) Roadside Safety Sub-committee urges more cooperation
    November 17, 2015
    The AFB20 (2) Roadside Safety Sub-committee on International Research Activities calls for closer cooperation between road authorities and the industry On 15 September 2015, the AFB20 (2) Roadside Safety Sub-committee on International Research Activities held its third European workshop in Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Portugal's road safety initiative
    February 14, 2012
    The Portuguese experience with road safety has proved that planning, development, introduction, and hard work do pay off in the end. Paulo Marques Augusto, president of the National Road Safety Authority (ANSR), explained that in the last 10 years a decrease of over 50% has been achieved in the number of fatalities on the road network despite a continuing growth in traffic demand (there are five million vehicles in Portugal), and a similar reduction in travel time on most of the connections between Lisbon a