Skip to main content

Crash test highlights barrier safety

The event, organised by UK Roads, was held in association with MIRA (formerly Motor Industry Research Association); Mott MacDonald and Traffex/Road Expo, also offered an exhibition of related products and services from MIRA; FSP (Frangible Safety Posts); 3A Composites; ASD Metal Services; JPCS; Tofco; FLI Structures (screwpile demonstrations); Highway Care; Gloucester Composites; Traffex; Road Expo; Brett Landscaping; NAL and SAPA.
February 24, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
There was extensive intrusion into the driver’s area after collision with a traditional steel column, while there was minimal intrusion into the driver’s area after collision with a passive column

The event, organised by UK Roads, was held in association with 3158 MIRA (formerly Motor Industry Research Association); 2579 Mott MacDonald and 346 Traffex/Road Expo, also offered an exhibition of related products and services from MIRA; FSP (Frangible Safety Posts); 3A Composites; ASD Metal Services; JPCS; Tofco; FLI Structures (screwpile demonstrations); Highway Care; 3162 Gloucester Composites; Traffex; Road Expo; 3161 Brett Landscaping; NAL and SAPA.

In one demonstration, a Ford Fiesta was crashed sideways at 35km/hour into a traditional unforgiving steel lighting column, mounted in a retention socket supplied and installed by NAL. The column and the socket were unaffected, but according to police officers present the damage inflicted was likely to have resulted in serious head, arm and leg injuries for the driver.

The column was removed from the socket, which was then available to be re-used to support a replacement column.
In another demonstration, a Suzuki Swift was crashed at 100km/hour into two 140mm diameter passively safe composite posts (provided by Frangible Safety Posts/1604 FSP) simultaneously. This was to highlight that despite two of these products being struck at the same time they do not significantly reduce the speed of the vehicle, and therefore do not subject the occupants to unacceptable deceleration forces.

The posts were mounted in Orion sockets provided by Poletech and supported a lighter weight composite sign plate provided by 3159 3A Composites and 3054 ASD metal services.

“The FSP posts performed perfectly, yielding on impact. The Orion sockets were unaffected by the impact which were then available to be re-used for replacement posts,” said an observer.
Another Ford Fiesta was crashed sideways at 35km/hour into a passively safe 15m lighting column provided by SAPA and mounted in a retention socket supplied and installed by NAL.

“Despite the low speed and orientation of the impact, the product still performed perfectly, shearing away as it is designed to do, causing very little damage or intrusion to the side of the car, and significantly less than that caused by the traditional column in demonstration one. It is very unlikely that any serious injury would have been sustained by the driver as a result.”
In the fourth demonstration, a Vauxhall Vectra was crashed at 100km/hour into a TAU crash cushion provided by 1529 Highway Care. “The demonstration was a perfect example of how crash cushions can prevent serious injury and save lives. The car was brought to a controlled halt by the TAU cushion without it experiencing any rotational or overturning forces,” said the observer.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Industry AMS opts for safety in any direction
    January 25, 2017
    Italian company AMS explains how its crashworthy end terminals act like a crash cushion Industry AMS (Automation Manufacturing Services) has developed a crashworthy end terminal tested according to part 7 of the EN 1317 that is classified as a double-sided and bi-directional end terminal. Starting from the European version of the terminal, and based on the same architecture, AMS has designed the SMA (Safety Modular Absorber) as a reinforced end-terminal in order to be complaint with both the MASH and
  • Improving safety barriers for motorcyclists
    February 20, 2012
    Delays to better barrier safety pose further risks for Europe's powered two wheeled riders. The issue of safety for powered two wheeler riders (PTWRs) is a matter of some debate in Europe. Although Europe's PTWRs make up a mere fraction of the vehicle population, they figure highly in accident statistics. Safety provisions could be improved using available technology but a recent political decision has downgraded the importance of such a move.
  • New roller barrier from Korean firm ETI
    April 23, 2019
    South Korean firm ETI is offering a novel roller barrier system, designed to reduce crash risks. The system meets both US and European requirements for barriers and is well-proven in the South Korean market, with over 100km in use on the country’s road network. In addition, the firm has also supplied systems to customers in other Asian countries including Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand, as well as Latin America, including Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Mexico. For the moment the company has not yet
  • New barrier, crash cushion and access control technology will benefit road user safety
    October 26, 2012
    Protecting road users, with barriers, crash cushions or access control systems, is crucial for network safety - Mike Woof writes Tough regulations are now in place in Europe and the US, requiring road authorities to provide safer road infrastructure than in the past. Technologies to reduce the severity of vehicle impacts against obstructions or redirect vehicles into the roadway should help cut injuries amongst drivers and passengers alike. The specifications for the use of crash cushions and barriers can v