Skip to main content

Oslofjord Tunnel closed for repairs for up to three weeks

The 7km subsea Oslofjord Tunnel in Norway will be closed for up to three weeks after a truck caught fire in the tunnel on May 5. Norwegian media report that a 500m stretch was damaged - tunnel vault, cables, insulation and road surface. The tunnel is equipped with 25 evacuation rooms that can be sealed off from the main tunnel. Each room can provide pressurised space for up to 50 people while a fire is being fought. However, the latest incident has spurred the government to announce that a second tube will
May 12, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
The 7km subsea Oslofjord Tunnel in Norway will be closed for up to three weeks after a truck caught fire in the tunnel on May 5.


Norwegian media report that a 500m stretch was damaged - tunnel vault, cables, insulation and road surface.

The tunnel is equipped with 25 evacuation rooms that can be sealed off from the main tunnel. Each room can provide pressurised space for up to 50 people while a fire is being fought. However, the latest incident has spurred the government to announce that a second tube will be built to hopefully reduce closures and improve safety.

The National Transport Plan has allocated around €476 million for a new tunnel course, media reported.

The tunnel, opened in 2000 after three years of construction, runs from Hurum to Frogn along Norway’s south coast. It dips 134m below sea level with a maximum gradient of 7% and carries three lanes of National Road 23.

The tunnel was flooded and affected by a landslide in 2003 and flooded again in 2008, resulting in closures or part closures of several weeks at a time. Before the latest vehicle fire, there was one in 2006 and one in 2011.

The latest fire prompted to the former head engineer of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration to publically voice concern about safety in the tunnel system, including any proposed new courses. Ove Solheim, a retired civil engineer, told the Oslo-based Aftenposten, Norway’s largest newspaper, that there needed to be three tunnel courses to ensure absolute safety.

He also called for an emergency lane within the tunnel system and an extra lane for slow-moving vehicles. He pointed out that there were 200 temporary closures last year.

Solheim also said that a two-lane bridge was a viable option, but it might cost as much as two new tunnels.

Related Content

  • Norway agrees funding for road repairs
    June 29, 2023
    Construction and civil engineering association EBA says the allocated €103 million will go a long way to shoring up road maintenance requirements on national roads.
  • Norway moves toward more E39 coastal road improvements
    April 4, 2019
    Norway is working on plans to make more of the major north-south E39 coastal route a ferry-free highway, coasting €35.3 billion, according to media. In Norway, the trans-European route 39 is part national road system and is developed and maintained by the public roads administration. It runs for 1,330km along the coast from Klett just south of Trondheim to Nørresundby. Norway’s E39 is mostly a two-lane undivided road with only relatively short sections near Stavanger, Trondheim and Bergen being motorw
  • Briefly, and to the point
    May 9, 2012
    The low risk found for driving through the tunnel is primarily due to the low volume of traffic of around 11,000 vehicles/day and the ban on HGVs and the transport of hazardous goods. Unidirectional traffic, sufficiently wide lanes, emergency lanes and lighting are the main reasons for the very good result for preventive measures. The tunnel is monitored around-the-clock in a tunnel control centre manned by trained staff, and incidents are automatically reported to the control centre by video link. If neces
  • Briefly, and to the point
    April 10, 2012
    Duplex A86 tunnel. The low risk found for driving through the tunnel is primarily due to the low volume of traffic of around 11,000 vehicles/day and the ban on HGVs and the transport of hazardous goods.