Oslofjord Tunnel closed for repairs for up to three weeks

The 7km subsea Oslofjord Tunnel in Norway will be closed for up to three weeks after a truck caught fire in the tunnel on May 5. Norwegian media report that a 500m stretch was damaged - tunnel vault, cables, insulation and road surface. The tunnel is equipped with 25 evacuation rooms that can be sealed off from the main tunnel. Each room can provide pressurised space for up to 50 people while a fire is being fought. However, the latest incident has spurred the government to announce that a second tube will
May 12, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
The 7km subsea Oslofjord Tunnel in Norway will be closed for up to three weeks after a truck caught fire in the tunnel on May 5.


Norwegian media report that a 500m stretch was damaged - tunnel vault, cables, insulation and road surface.

The tunnel is equipped with 25 evacuation rooms that can be sealed off from the main tunnel. Each room can provide pressurised space for up to 50 people while a fire is being fought. However, the latest incident has spurred the government to announce that a second tube will be built to hopefully reduce closures and improve safety.

The National Transport Plan has allocated around €476 million for a new tunnel course, media reported.

The tunnel, opened in 2000 after three years of construction, runs from Hurum to Frogn along Norway’s south coast. It dips 134m below sea level with a maximum gradient of 7% and carries three lanes of National Road 23.

The tunnel was flooded and affected by a landslide in 2003 and flooded again in 2008, resulting in closures or part closures of several weeks at a time. Before the latest vehicle fire, there was one in 2006 and one in 2011.

The latest fire prompted to the former head engineer of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration to publically voice concern about safety in the tunnel system, including any proposed new courses. Ove Solheim, a retired civil engineer, told the Oslo-based Aftenposten, Norway’s largest newspaper, that there needed to be three tunnel courses to ensure absolute safety.

He also called for an emergency lane within the tunnel system and an extra lane for slow-moving vehicles. He pointed out that there were 200 temporary closures last year.

Solheim also said that a two-lane bridge was a viable option, but it might cost as much as two new tunnels.

Road Structures

Related Content

  • China to set up “international courts” for Belt and Road disputes
    February 6, 2018
    China plans to set up an “international court” for settling disputes among companies participating in Belt and Road transportation infrastructure work, according to Chinese media. The Global Time newspaper – with strong links to the communist government – reported that Chinese companies are facing more foreign-related lawsuits as they step up investment and business in countries covered by Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative. The report called Belt and Road “a brainchild of Xi”, referring to Xi Jinping
    Read More
  • Yeti ploughs ahead
    February 12, 2020
    Yeti Snow Technology, a developer of autonomous snow clearance systems for airports, will scale back pilot projects this winter and focus on software development.
    Read More
  • New Zealand’s Waterview project is moving closer to completion
    December 13, 2016
    New Zealand’s biggest road project is less than a year away from completion, and a lot of progress has been made since World Highways last looked at the project two years ago - Mary Searle Bell reports New Zealand’s Waterview project is moving closer to completion and will be the largest road project in the country. The NZ$2 billion Western Ring Route will see the creation of an alternative motorway to State Highway 1, which runs through the centre of Auckland. The 47km-long motorway will allow a large p
    Read More
  • Tunnels - an environmentally attractive option?
    February 21, 2012
    While tunnels are often more expensive than bridges, they can offer environmentally attractive options for transport schemes. Tunnels offer environmentally attractive options for a range of transport infrastructure schemes, but in many cases high construction costs may restrict their use.
    Read More

Highlighted Content