Skip to main content

ARTBA calls for more bridge repairs in US

The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) is calling for more bridge repairs in the US. There are still too many structurally deficient bridges in the US according to a recent analysis. This report states that while there were 2,574 fewer structurally deficient bridges in 2015 compared to the number in 2014, there are still 58,500 on the structurally deficient list. Worse still, at the current pace of bridge investment it will take at least 21 years before these bridges are all replace
February 18, 2016 Read time: 3 mins
The 920 American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) is calling for more bridge repairs in the US. There are still too many structurally deficient bridges in the US according to a recent analysis. This report states that while there were 2,574 fewer structurally deficient bridges in 2015 compared to the number in 2014, there are still 58,500 on the structurally deficient list. Worse still, at the current pace of bridge investment it will take at least 21 years before these bridges are all replaced or upgraded. Those are among the key findings in a new analysis of the US Department of Transportation’s recently-released 2015 National Bridge Inventory database.

The annual review of state bridge data collected by the federal agency, notes that if placed end-to-end, the deck surface of the nation’s structurally deficient bridges would stretch 2,144km. About 9.5% of the 610,000 or so bridges in the US are classified as structurally deficient ARTBA found. However, cars, trucks, school buses and emergency vehicles cross these deficient structures nearly 204 million times/day.

To help ensure safety, bridge decks and support structures are regularly inspected by the state transportation departments for deterioration and remedial action. They are rated on a scale of zero to nine—with nine meaning the bridge is in excellent condition. A bridge is classified as structurally deficient and in need of repair if its overall rating is four or below. Unfortunately, the funding made available to state and local transportation departments for bridge work is not keeping pace with needs.

While these bridges may not be imminently unsafe, the purpose of the report, the association said, is to help educate the public and policymakers that they have structural deficiencies that need repair.
 
Almost all of the 250 most heavily crossed structurally deficient bridges are on urban highways, particularly in California. Nearly 85% were built before 1970.
 
Iowa (5,025), Pennsylvania (4,783), Oklahoma (3,776), Missouri (3,222), Nebraska (2,474), Kansas (2,303), Illinois (2,244), Mississippi (2,184), North Carolina (2,085) and California (2,009) have the most structurally deficient bridges, the analysis found. The District of Columbia (10), Nevada (35), Delaware (48), Hawaii (60) and Utah (95) have the least.
 
At least 15% of the bridges in eight states—Rhode Island (23%), Pennsylvania (21%), Iowa (21%), South Dakota (20%), Oklahoma (16%), Nebraska (16%), North Dakota (16%) and West Virginia (15%)—fall in the structurally deficient category.
 
“Every year we have new bridges move on the list as structures deteriorate, or move off the list as improvements are made,” said Dr Alison Premo Black, ARTBA’s chief economist, who conducted the analysis. In the 2015 report, there were 4,625 structurally deficient bridges that were not so classified in 2014, she said. On the positive side, about 7,200 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2014 were repaired, replaced, rebuilt or removed from the 2015 inventory. The net effect, Black explained, is a slow national reduction in the overall number of structurally deficient structures.
 
Black noted the recently-enacted five-year federal highway and transit law provides a modest increase in funding for bridge repairs. But “the funding made available won’t come close to making an accelerated national bridge repair program possible,” she said. “It’s going to take major new investments by all levels of government to move toward eliminating the huge backlog of bridge work in the United States.”  
 
State specific bridge information from the analysis—including rankings and the locations of the 250 most heavily travelled structurally deficient bridges in the nation and top 25 most heavily travelled in each state—is available %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 oLinkExternal here Visit www.artbabridgereport.org Website false http://www.artbabridgereport.org/ false false%>.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Road tolling is vital for good roads
    January 2, 2024
    Upcoming transportation projects are outlined in planning documents throughout America by Mary Scott Nabers
  • Certified safe: ARTBA president talks future highways and safety
    January 16, 2020
    What keeps Dave Bauer* up at night? David Arminas caught up with the head of ARTBA at his Washington D.C. office during daylight hours
  • Kuwait Fund loans Sri Lanka US$35m for bridge reconstruction
    December 11, 2014
    Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development has awarded a loan worth nearly US$35 million to the Sri Lankan government for reconstructing 25 deteriorated road bridges. The bridges include three in Southern Province, four in Sabaragamuwa Province, nine in Western Province, three in Northern Province, five in North Western Province and a bridge in Eastern Province. The loan comes after the Ministry of Highways, Ports and Shipping sent out an invitation to bid in October, covering eight bridges along the
  • The US FAST Act: a job left unfinished
    April 4, 2016
    US roads and bridges are crumbling at an alarming rate as state governments wring their hands over the increasingly scarce money for repairs. Enter the FAST Act. But is it enough? US state transportation department officials, as well as highway contractors and operators, breathed a sigh of relief in December. For months the highways infrastructure sector waited anxiously to see where the necessary money for road projects would come from. For several years, the Highways Trust Fund – the usual way of paying f