Skip to main content

The road funding question posed by EVs

The growing market for electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrids world-wide will help reduce urban pollution in many areas, while also cutting reliance on oil for fuel. This switch away from reliance on oil for fuelling vehicles is undoubtedly a good thing and will help address pollution on a localised level and climate change right across the globe. However, it will also bring radical changes to the way that road development is funded.
September 9, 2016 Read time: 3 mins

The growing market for electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrids world-wide will help reduce urban pollution in many areas, while also cutting reliance on oil for fuel. This switch away from reliance on oil for fuelling vehicles is undoubtedly a good thing and will help address pollution on a localised level and climate change right across the globe.

However, it will also bring radical changes to the way that road development is funded. In many countries around the world it is fuel taxation that helps pay for road infrastructure. In many countries, and including most of Europe, these taxes are added to the general funding pot that governments use to pay for everything, including infrastructure. In the US, a portion of the price of each litre of fuel goes directly to the Highway Trust Fund, or to local state taxes to pay for road infrastructure. Lower demand for fuel for vehicles will reduce the income from fuel taxation.

While hybrid vehicles and EVs may have a much lower CO2 footprint, they still take up space on the highway network and cause wear and tear to the roads.

With fuel prices being far higher in China and Europe, and China in particular keen to cut air pollution in major cities, these markets are already seeing a faster take-up of EVs. The market for these low-emission vehicles will increase. In China, road infrastructure is funded by central and local governments and fuel taxation may be less of an issue. But in Europe and many other markets the switch to low-emission vehicles could trigger a move towards other road funding methods, including road user charging.

Low fuel prices mean that the US will probably be later to adopt EVs but solutions are already being suggested to address the coming funding shortage. A report released by the American Road & Transportation Builder Association (ARTBA) could point the way forward. The report was developed by ARTBA’s Transportation Investment Advocacy Centre (TIAC) Council and suggests a model for generating state transportation revenues through registration fees on electric and hybrid electric vehicles. This report was developed to provide state legislators and transportation advocates a starting point for crafting legislation to enact similar user fees in their states, or increase transportation funding through varying methods.

“Several states have enacted these types of fees. Although the number of electric and hybrid electric vehicles is a small part of the total US fleet, that number is expected to grow in the future, and states are looking for ways to make sure they are contributing to transportation programmes,” said ARTBA chief economist and TIAC director, Dr Alison Premo Black.

Related Content

  • ARTBA’s research reveals US public supports infrastructure investment
    November 15, 2012
    According to the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA), US voters are keen to see increased spending on infrastructure. ARTBA’s analysis suggests that voters approve nearly 70% of state and local transportation ballot initiatives, which is consistent with the results of the last four US elections. ARTBA tracked 31 measures overall; five were statewide initiatives and 26 were local. The measures would increase or extend funding for highways, bridges and transit. All of the seven bond in
  • Us bridges pose cause for concern
    August 2, 2017
    On Aug 1st 2017, it was 10 years since the I-35W Bridge in Minneapolis collapsed. The bridge had been classified as structurally deficient and was undergoing repair at the time. However the repairs focussed on the decking rather than the structure, with the additional weight of the extra asphalt layers and the construction machinery parked adding to the total load and contributing to the collapse.
  • The US FAST Act: a job left unfinished
    April 4, 2016
    US roads and bridges are crumbling at an alarming rate as state governments wring their hands over the increasingly scarce money for repairs. Enter the FAST Act. But is it enough? US state transportation department officials, as well as highway contractors and operators, breathed a sigh of relief in December. For months the highways infrastructure sector waited anxiously to see where the necessary money for road projects would come from. For several years, the Highways Trust Fund – the usual way of paying f
  • Solutions to road user charging
    April 11, 2012
    In this second of a two-part article, Jack Opiola, demonstrates that the imposition of a government provided GPS mandate to levy mileage tax could be eliminated by offering motorists transparent choices regarding their manner of compliance. The key to a mileage tax system without a GPS mandate is through offering motorists choices. Most motorists are consumers who are comfortable with selecting products and services from among options available in the marketplace. A mileage tax can be built upon this reali