Skip to main content

Reinforcements arrive from TSL

When soil conditions fail to give adequate support for barrier posts, TSL Engineering has produced a solution - S.C.Re.W.S. (Save Crash REinforcing Weak Soil) system.
May 4, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
An installation machine at work

In order to install a road barrier, it must be crash-tested in a test house by a certifying body to declare that it conforms to European Union standards, explains TSL, based in Rome.

The barrier’s correct behaviour is guaranteed by the interaction between its posts and the soil into which it is installed. As such, the soil’s characteristics must give the post its maximum security of installation which in turn guarantees the barrier behaves as predicted during laboratory tests or test-bed sessions.

However, in real life, installations do not always occur in soil with suitable characteristics. In these cases, when a vehicle crashes into the barrier, the structure is inevitably incapable of containing the vehicle and redirecting it back onto the roadway. The solutions usually adopted not only fail to solve the problem but are also quite expensive, according to TSL.

Where soil conditions fall short of what is needed for complete barrier performance, the S.C.Re.W.S. system provides the necessary strength to the post installation. S.C.Re.W.S. transfers impact loads to the road pavement subgrade that has stronger mechanical characteristics than those of the embankment. This anchorage system allows the post to bend in a predefined spot and, via its plastic deformation, correctly dissipate the energy of the impact, similarly to what happens during a crash test.

TSL says that its system has been tested by numerous certifying bodies.

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Industry AMS opts for safety in any direction
    January 25, 2017
    Italian company AMS explains how its crashworthy end terminals act like a crash cushion Industry AMS (Automation Manufacturing Services) has developed a crashworthy end terminal tested according to part 7 of the EN 1317 that is classified as a double-sided and bi-directional end terminal. Starting from the European version of the terminal, and based on the same architecture, AMS has designed the SMA (Safety Modular Absorber) as a reinforced end-terminal in order to be complaint with both the MASH and
  • Barriers to safety
    April 1, 2021
    All vehicle restraint devices on European roads are – or should be - certified according to the European impact standard EN 1317, implying conformity. But it doesn’t necessarily ensure that the crash barrier will perform its main aim of saving the vehicle occupants’ lives.
  • VIDEO: Huesker explains “Interaction flexibility”
    August 4, 2017
    Huesker, an earthworks and foundation designer for roads and pavements, has posted a short video explaining “interaction flexibility”, a new term for geogrid-reinforced structures. Interaction flexibility is an important technical term, as important as tensile strength and tensile stiffness, to secure the quality of a geogrid reinforced construction, explains the engineering team at Huesker which has its head office in Gescher, Germany.
  • Barriers to European safety: how safe is safe?
    February 1, 2021
    Roberto Impero, chief executive of SMA Road Safety, and Stefano Caterino, head of SMA's marketing, urge a major rethink about how European crash cushions and end terminals are tested for safety certification.