Skip to main content

Just stop arguing and build the thing

The news that the preferred route has been announced for a new road and tunnel link that will bypass the UK’s famous Stonehenge stone circle comes after years of debate. The project is for the construction of a new 13km dual carriageway link and includes a 2.6km stretch of tunnel, which is the subject of some controversy. Because of the archeological importance of the area, the tunnel has been decided as being the best option for the new route. Building a tunnel will allow much of the important archeologi
December 15, 2017 Read time: 3 mins
The news that the preferred route has been announced for a new road and tunnel link that will bypass the UK’s famous Stonehenge stone circle comes after years of debate.


The project is for the construction of a new 13km dual carriageway link and includes a 2.6km stretch of tunnel, which is the subject of some controversy.

Because of the archeological importance of the area, the tunnel has been decided as being the best option for the new route. Building a tunnel will allow much of the important archeological site to remain undisturbed. However some claim that the tunnel, is simply not long enough.

With this in mind it is worth remembering that the Stonehenge Bypass project has been planned since the late 1980s. The project went to public consultation in 1993 and the route was identified in 1995, with it then being withdrawn in 1996. In 1998, the project was put forward again and a preferred route announced in 1999, but after a public inquiry in 2004 and concerns over costs in 2005, it was withdrawn once more in 2007. It seems the work may finally go ahead, but only if it passes a few more hurdles. The dispute over whether a 2.6km tunnel is long enough is just one issue. Other complaints describe the planned tunnel portals as unsightly and say that the existing (and heavily congested) road link should remain.

But nor are such failures to develop much-needed infrastructure links limited to the UK. In the Canadian province of British Colombia came the news recently that plans for a US$2.8 billion, 10-lane bridge crossing to replace the aged George Massey Tunnel near Vancouver had been halted. The 3km-long cable-stayed bridge would have been built to the latest standards and would boost both safety and capacity, cutting congestion for drivers. It is much needed. The tunnel, constructed in the 1950s and opened to traffic in 1959, is no longer fit for purpose. The four-lane tunnel is the subject of serious congestion and does not meet the latest safety standards. More worryingly still, there are concerns as to whether it would withstand an earthquake, as Vancouver lies close to the Cascadia Fault. Perhaps the new Massey Bridge will get the go-ahead, once the local politicians realise that not to build it will cause more fuss in the long run. Only time will tell.

Related Content

  • Bridge demolition with breakers
    May 5, 2021
    Hydraulic breakers from Italian firm Indeco have been used successfully to carry out important work on the Princes Freeway in Australia’s Victoria State.
  • Risk warnings for UK revealed with new data
    May 9, 2013
    New data from the UK reveals key information about road risk factors both across the country and in capital London. A new report reveals that around 68% of pedestrian casualties are adults who are at greatest risk on weekend evenings and after consuming alcohol. Meanwhile another separate study in London reveals that cyclists are not at fault in most crashes in which they are involved.
  • The drive for US road funding: will corporate America get a seat?
    September 13, 2017
    Trumponomics aims to use public money for pump-priming an even greater amount of cash from the private sector to improve America’s crumbling roads. But is political will matching corporate America’s enthusiasm for more private investment, asks David Arminas If there were ever a test case for comparing public-private partnerships and design-build contracts, the recently completed Ohio River Bridges Project is it (see previous article).
  • Bridge savings in Scotland to fund road improvements
    August 27, 2014
    The project to construct the new Forth Crossing close to Scottish capital Edinburgh is looking extremely positive, with cost savings envisaged for the bridge. The Queensferry Crossing scheme now looks to require slightly less funding than had been originally expected when the plans were unveiled in 2011, due in part to tight controls over spending. The bridge costs had been budgeted at close to €2 billion (£1.6 billion) initially but the project now looks likely to cost €1.81 billion (£1.45 billion). The sa