Skip to main content

Just stop arguing and build the thing

The news that the preferred route has been announced for a new road and tunnel link that will bypass the UK’s famous Stonehenge stone circle comes after years of debate. The project is for the construction of a new 13km dual carriageway link and includes a 2.6km stretch of tunnel, which is the subject of some controversy. Because of the archeological importance of the area, the tunnel has been decided as being the best option for the new route. Building a tunnel will allow much of the important archeologi
December 15, 2017 Read time: 3 mins
The news that the preferred route has been announced for a new road and tunnel link that will bypass the UK’s famous Stonehenge stone circle comes after years of debate.


The project is for the construction of a new 13km dual carriageway link and includes a 2.6km stretch of tunnel, which is the subject of some controversy.

Because of the archeological importance of the area, the tunnel has been decided as being the best option for the new route. Building a tunnel will allow much of the important archeological site to remain undisturbed. However some claim that the tunnel, is simply not long enough.

With this in mind it is worth remembering that the Stonehenge Bypass project has been planned since the late 1980s. The project went to public consultation in 1993 and the route was identified in 1995, with it then being withdrawn in 1996. In 1998, the project was put forward again and a preferred route announced in 1999, but after a public inquiry in 2004 and concerns over costs in 2005, it was withdrawn once more in 2007. It seems the work may finally go ahead, but only if it passes a few more hurdles. The dispute over whether a 2.6km tunnel is long enough is just one issue. Other complaints describe the planned tunnel portals as unsightly and say that the existing (and heavily congested) road link should remain.

But nor are such failures to develop much-needed infrastructure links limited to the UK. In the Canadian province of British Colombia came the news recently that plans for a US$2.8 billion, 10-lane bridge crossing to replace the aged George Massey Tunnel near Vancouver had been halted. The 3km-long cable-stayed bridge would have been built to the latest standards and would boost both safety and capacity, cutting congestion for drivers. It is much needed. The tunnel, constructed in the 1950s and opened to traffic in 1959, is no longer fit for purpose. The four-lane tunnel is the subject of serious congestion and does not meet the latest safety standards. More worryingly still, there are concerns as to whether it would withstand an earthquake, as Vancouver lies close to the Cascadia Fault. Perhaps the new Massey Bridge will get the go-ahead, once the local politicians realise that not to build it will cause more fuss in the long run. Only time will tell.

Related Content

  • Latest VMS keeps world’s motorists moving safely
    April 10, 2013
    VMS for what is thought to be the longest road tunnel in the Middle East, and the installation of the latest VMS technology in Canada’s oldest national park to help motorists travelling through it are among the projects discussed by Guy Woodford. A large volume of VMS from Italian firm Solari has been installed in the new 4.2km-long Zayed Street Tunnel in Abu Dhabi – thought to be the longest in the Middle East. The Solari VMS supply consisted of 204 lane control signs, with Red, Yellow and Green LED pre-de
  • Spencer Group cable access for Pattullo Bridge
    July 3, 2023
    Spencer is working on behalf of Fraser Crossing Constructors GP - a joint venture between Acciona and Aecon - on the suspension bridge near Vancouver, Canada.
  • Temporary bridges after Tretten collapse
    August 22, 2022
    The 150m-long, 10m-wide Tretten Bridge - only a decade old - broke in two, collapsing into the river stranding two vehicles and their occupants.
  • Brake and Direct Line survey: UK drivers flout traffic laws
    April 28, 2015
    Half of UK drivers in a recent survey admitted to breaking traffic laws and half of these drivers said they did it with intention. Of the drivers who willingly broke the law, half acknowledged they did it because they believed there was little chance of getting caught, or they simply did not agree the law and saw no reason to obey. Road safety charity Brake and vehicle insurance company Direct Line said the survey reveals a worrying attitude by many road users toward safety on highways. Brake said that U