Skip to main content

Indeco expects significant growth in US attachment market

Italian attachment manufacturer Indeco is poised to meet a significant rise in demand in the US market. “There is definitely room for growth here,” said Indeco marketing and commercial director Michele Vitulano. “Look at the grab: it’s just starting to be used in the US.”
March 9, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Indeco’s Michele Vitulano: “This is a dynamic market.”

Italian attachment manufacturer 237 Indeco is poised to meet a significant rise in demand in the US market.

“There is definitely room for growth here,” said Indeco marketing and commercial director Michele Vitulano. “Look at the grab: it’s just starting to be used in the US.”

Then there is President Donald Trump’s proposed multi-billion dollar infrastructure plan. “In the past 30 years in the US, nothing has been done,” Vitulano said. “They need to start again and reinvest in this country.”

Indeco’s market and market share has been growing in the States over the past decade so that it is now the number two supplier. US sales account for over half of the company’s turnover.

“In our niche industry, the crisis in the US came earlier. In 2005-06 there was a big drop in hydraulic hammers and attachments sold in the US; after that the US market was recovering pretty quickly and the European market was dead,” said Vitulano.

Indeco’s US business is based in Connecticut and has a manufacturing facility which currently makes hydraulic compactors. “The idea is to look at the possibility of doing more manufacturing in the US,” he added. “We made a big investment 10 years ago; it is a huge premises and we have room to grow.”

Vitulano hints that he wants to extend the company’s range of products, though he doesn’t know yet whether this will be through acquisition or through direct investment in product development. “This is a dynamic market,” he suggested. “We need to understand what changes are taking place and what our opportunities and obstacles will be in the future.”

Important product lines currently in the US are steel shears to service the huge number scrap and recycling yards and the manufacturer’s boom system.

“The dimensions of crushing plants here in the US are crazy, bigger than any other part of the world including Australia. The booms we make for the US market are like an excavator boom.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Wirtgen going for growth
    May 28, 2012
    The Wirtgen Group has held a highly successful Technology Days event at the brand new Kleemann facility in Göppingen near Stuttgart. Some 2,600 people attended this year's event, the largest of the three held so far by the firm. A key focus for this year was highlighting the full integration of the Kleemann crushing equipment operation within the Wirtgen Group. The previous Technology Days events were held at the Hamm facility in Tirschenreuth and at the Wirtgen headquarters in Windhagen. Following the Kle
  • The drive for US road funding: will corporate America get a seat?
    September 13, 2017
    Trumponomics aims to use public money for pump-priming an even greater amount of cash from the private sector to improve America’s crumbling roads. But is political will matching corporate America’s enthusiasm for more private investment, asks David Arminas If there were ever a test case for comparing public-private partnerships and design-build contracts, the recently completed Ohio River Bridges Project is it (see previous article).
  • LiuGong closes Dressta deal
    March 21, 2012
    Chinese manufacturer LiuGong Machinery has finalised its agreement to acquire Polish firm HSW (Huta Stalowa Wola) and its distribution subsidiary, Dressta. The agreement was signed by executives from both companies in Warsaw.
  • Engineering elegance in bridge design
    July 9, 2012
    Multi-award-winning bridge designer Michel Virlogeux was the keynote speaker at the recent Austroads Bridge conference, held in Auckland, New Zealand, last month. He had a simple message: Bridge design is the realm of the engineer and should not be given to architects. "Bridge architecture, bridge aesthetics, bridge elegance is the problem of engineers. We must not leave this major part of our job to architects," he said. "I always work with an architect, but the architect is not selecting the structure. To