Skip to main content

Distracted driving from smartphone use poses a major road safety threat

Cell phone use while driving is not appreciated amongst drivers for the risk it presents. And with people growing ever more reliant on smartphones and other hand-held devices, the issue of distracted driving looks set to increase. Automotive manufacturers are installing wifi and other technologies in new generation vehicles in a bid to broaden market appeal, particularly to younger drivers. But it seems little thought has been given to the safety risks these pose should drivers attempt to use them when behi
December 10, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
Cell phone use while driving is not appreciated amongst drivers for the risk it presents. And with people growing ever more reliant on smartphones and other hand-held devices, the issue of distracted driving looks set to increase. Automotive manufacturers are installing wifi and other technologies in new generation vehicles in a bid to broaden market appeal, particularly to younger drivers. But it seems little thought has been given to the safety risks these pose should drivers attempt to use them when behind the wheel. Driving a car while carrying out a phone call is a depressingly common sight on the world’s roads, despite huge quantities of data showing the risk this presents. One problem is that it is still considered by many as a minor issue, rather than a major safety hazard.

Around 30 years ago, drink driving was considered a victimless crime by many in Europe and the US. This was reflected in the annual road fatality figures, with an enormous number of needless deaths caused by those under the influence at the wheel. Time and education has changed this situation, a major factor in the reduction in road fatalities in Europe and the US, as well as Australia, Japan and Singapore. Similar benefits have yet to be seen in developing countries, though in some the crackdown on drink driving is already underway.

As research shows the risks involved in using a cell phone while driving to be broadly the same as being under the influence for alcohol, why are the penalties for offenders not similar? Sending a text while driving can increase the risk of a crash by a factor of 28.

Research has also shown that hands-free phone kits offer next to no safety benefits as the key issue relates not to the dexterity required to juggle a phone and the controls of a car, but the brain functions themselves.

The human brain has severe limitations when it comes to multitasking and carrying out complex functions such as a conversation and driving a car. Put simply, give the human brain too many decisions to make at once and it will whirr away like an old computer that has been asked to carry out several demanding functions and push its processing power to the limit. Military pilots of fast jets or attack helicopters in particular are selected on their ability to multitask. A tough selection process is used to cherry-pick a few individuals and then weed out those without the specific capabilities. Bear in mind these pilots represent the cream of the crop but even so, can only cope with the demanding tasks required for comparatively short missions.

Perhaps technology will be able to provide humans with graft-on additional processing power in the not too distant future. And looking further ahead, the human brain may evolve additional brain power. But this last is firmly in the future.

Related Content

  • UK traffic offence convictions increase
    May 10, 2018
    Official UK Government figures reveal that convictions for traffic offences in England and Wales have been steadily increasing since 2013. Of concern is that there has been a 52% increase in convictions for dangerous driving in that period. There were guilty verdicts for 1.2 million traffic offences in 2006, according to an analysis of the data by IAM RoadSmart. The number of guilty verdicts for traffic offences then declined for seven years until 2014 when the total number of offences started rising again
  • IAM pollsters support traffic light risk system for driving on prescription drugs
    October 16, 2013
    Just half of drivers feel prescription drug labelling is clear enough on medicines, according to the latest poll by road safety charity the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM). Earlier this year, the government announced that a drug-driving bill will be introduced and will include chemicals which can be found in prescription drugs. Almost a third of respondents suggest that a simple traffic-light system would be the best method to inform people of the risks of using prescription drugs when driving.
  • Passengers’ pestering proves distracting for drivers
    January 4, 2016
    A survey of drivers carried out in the UK reveals that a significant portion believe their spouse to be their most annoying passenger. This could pose a serious risk too since annoying passengers can provide a major distraction to drivers. The survey, carried out by car leasing firm OSV said that 43% of male drivers and 41% of female drivers found their spouse to be the most annoying passenger. The survey also found that around 65% of motorists admit to regularly arguing in their car. Other annoying passeng
  • Police call fortougher alcohol limits for UK drivers
    May 20, 2015
    The British Police Federation calling for the blood alcohol limit to be lowered. This call has also been backed by the campaigning road safety charity, Brake as well as the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (ROSPA). Evidence from Scotland where the drink driving limit was lowered during 2014 has shown a reduction in drink driving offences. This move would bring the UK into line with other European countries with regard to alcohol limits by reducing the level from the current 80mg/100ml of blood