Skip to main content

Cutting congestion in LA?

A new proposal has been put forward for Los Angeles suggesting that a congestion charging scheme be introduced to help tackle the city’s transport woes. According to the CEO of the Los Angeles Metro system, the revenue from the congestion charge for drivers could then be used to allow people to use the city’s transit system for free. Many US cities depend heavily on road transport for carrying goods and commuting. However as many inhabitants and visitors to Los Angeles can attest, the sprawling city and it
June 4, 2019 Read time: 3 mins
A new proposal has been put forward for Los Angeles suggesting that a congestion charging scheme be introduced to help tackle the city’s transport woes. According to the CEO of the Los Angeles Metro system, the revenue from the congestion charge for drivers could then be used to allow people to use the city’s transit system for free.


Many US cities depend heavily on road transport for carrying goods and commuting. However as many inhabitants and visitors to Los Angeles can attest, the sprawling city and its many highways and urban roads can be frustratingly difficult to drive through at peak periods. Jams are frequent and even comparatively short journeys can take a long time.

Whether the congestion charging scheme would prove popular with the city’s inhabitants remains to be seen. Given the widespread dependence on cars for personal transport, as well as the undeveloped nature of the public transport system (with comparatively few routes for its metro), it seems likely that resistance to the proposals will be high.

But resistance to congestion charging proposals will not get people to and from their work any quicker. It is worth remembering that several studies have listed Los Angeles amongst the world’s top 10 most traffic-congested cities. Other major cities around the world that are notorious for traffic delays include Bangkok, Beijing, Cairo, Delhi, Istanbul, Mexico City, Moscow and Sao Paulo.

The proposed scheme would see drivers in Los Angeles being charged for entering certain districts of the city at peak travel periods. This novel proposal has been put forward as a way of smoothing out transport ahead of the 2028 Olympic Games. Reducing traffic congestion through a charging system would also help lower pollution levels in the city, with its bad smog problem.

London did set a precedent when it commenced its congestion charging scheme in 2003. The move cut congestion in the charging zone by 10% in the decade following its introduction. Meanwhile the scheme also raised considerable revenue, which was directed towards the city’s transport system.

Other major cities with some form of congestion charging for road users include Milan, Singapore and Stockholm. As with London, the authorities in these cities were keen to reduce traffic congestion and journey times, as well as lowering urban pollution. Congestion charging or road user charging have also been proposed as ways of reducing traffic delays in Hong Kong, although the city does have rather better public transport facilities than most US cities.

Nor is Los Angeles the only US city to be considering introducing a congestion charging scheme for drivers. Proposals have also been put forward to establish congestion charging in New York City. It is of note that New York City is one of the few cities in the US with a well-developed public transport system. However the city’s subway system has suffered from insufficient funding over a number of years and is now in desperate need of additional funding, which a congestion charging scheme could help deliver.

Related Content

  • Purple haze – the exhaust debate
    May 25, 2016
    Following in the wake of the VW diesel engine emissions scandal, serious questions are finally being asked with regard to exhaust pollution. Car manufacturers have published data on the emissions from their vehicles for many years, but there has been a widespread scepticism as to how these figures have been achieved. The issue of claimed road vehicle exhaust emissions is a case of smoke and mirrors.
  • The US FAST Act: a job left unfinished
    April 4, 2016
    US roads and bridges are crumbling at an alarming rate as state governments wring their hands over the increasingly scarce money for repairs. Enter the FAST Act. But is it enough? US state transportation department officials, as well as highway contractors and operators, breathed a sigh of relief in December. For months the highways infrastructure sector waited anxiously to see where the necessary money for road projects would come from. For several years, the Highways Trust Fund – the usual way of paying f
  • Australia’s road safety problems are a cause for concern
    January 23, 2019
    The Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) has highlighted key problems with road safety. According to the ARRB, these issues must be addressed if Australia’s road casualty rate is to be reduced. Road death tolls are being reduced as he latest results show, but more work needs to be done. According to the ARRB, the road death tolls in Victoria dropped 20% for 2018 when compared with the previous year. This is a major improvement, showing the gains made by Victoria’s road agency VicRoads and the state’s Tr
  • Lindsay argues the case for reversible lanes over adding lanes
    June 26, 2018
    Build new lanes or use existing lanes more effectively? In a recent US study* commissioned by Lindsay Transportation Solutions, the company argues the case for reversible lanes. The level of future uncertainty in transportation planning - specifically in addressing congestion on urban freeways - has increased significantly over the past few years. The impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow, of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) initiatives, particularly the car-sharing elements, and exciting