Chicago Pneumatic’s new excavator compaction attachment

Chicago Pneumatic is offering a new range of hydraulic compactor attachments. The firm’s RC range is said to offer increased performance over the models being replaced. The new line-up includes five models for use on carriers with an operating weight of 1-40 tonnes. The units are said to feature robust construction along with high performance and efficiency, as well as easy maintenance. These attachments are designed for use in demanding applications such as slope and trench compaction, or preparation for p
January 6, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Versatility is claimed for Chicago Pneumatic’s new excavator-mounted compactors
6097 Chicago Pneumatic is offering a new range of hydraulic compactor attachments. The firm’s RC range is said to offer increased performance over the models being replaced. The new line-up includes five models for use on carriers with an operating weight of 1-40 tonnes. The units are said to feature robust construction along with high performance and efficiency, as well as easy maintenance. These attachments are designed for use in demanding applications such as slope and trench compaction, or preparation for piling work.

Chicago Pneumatic says that the units are built to deliver maximum uptime and minimum downtime as well as being durable, long-lasting and simple to maintain.

All the models in the RC range are designed for rapid fitting onto a carrier and do not require any special installation procedures. The units are said to combine high compaction frequency with high vibrating forces. To reduce stress on the compactor and carrier during operation, the housing is offset by 15%. This provides better force distribution across the plate, in addition to lower rates of wear and tear.

Meanwhile integrated flow rate and pressure controls help ensure that the hydraulic compactors are protected against hydraulic overload situations. This maximises operator safety and saves time when switching the compactors between different carriers. Low maintenance needs are claimed with an oil bath around the shaft bearing to deliver greasing, while Chicago Pneumatic’s AutoLube system eliminates the need for regular manual greasing.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • An array of crushing and screening innovations was presented at the recent INTERMAT 2012 exhibition
    July 19, 2012
    The crushing and screening phase is a crucial component in aggregate production and new development will help optimise performance - Mike Woof reports Crushing and screening is a key part of the quarrying cycle and has a huge impact on overall operating performance. Optimising operations will cut running costs, reduce materials wastage and also provide a more consistent product quality, boosting cost-effectiveness dramatically. An array of innovations were revealed to the market at the recent INTERMAT 2012
    Read More
  • Compaction machine innovations available
    August 5, 2022
    Major manufacturers are offering a range of new compaction machines and technology to the market
    Read More
  • Tools for breaking
    February 9, 2012
    Mike Woof reports on equipment developments in the demolition sector. The hydraulic hammer is a tough tool used in a wide array of demolition jobs. Highly versatile, the breaker has evolved from a simple design based on rockdrilling equipment into a sophisticated and reliable piece of machinery. German firm Krupp and French company Montabert were pioneers of the hydraulic breaker, being followed into the market by a growing array of other manufacturers. Early breakers had the unfortunate habit of tearing th
    Read More
  • Smart intelligent compaction system from Dynapac
    April 2, 2024
    Dynapac is making an important introduction to its asphalt compaction line in the shape of its innovative Seismic technology. First developed for use in soil compaction, the resonant frequency, self-sensing Seismic system is now available as an option for the more complex asphalt compaction segment. A spokesperson for Dynapac said, “It was more complicated and took five years of R&D and needed a lot of testing.”
    Read More

Highlighted Content