Skip to main content

AEM’s 2050 Vision winner combines road and rail

Five finalists for the Association of Equipment Manufacturer’s (AEM’s) Infrastructure Vision 2050 Challenge fought for the winning place in a live final, held at CONEXPO-CON/AGG’s Tech Experience zone. The finalists had to pitch their ideas to three judges in one of the white Tech Experience domes.
March 9, 2017 Read time: 3 mins
Students Anthony Barrs and Baiyu Chen from the University of Califorinia, Berkeley, winners of AEM’s Infrastructure Vision 2050 Challenge

Five finalists for the Association of Equipment Manufacturer’s (676 AEM’s) Infrastructure Vision 2050 Challenge fought for the winning place in a live final, held at CONEXPO-CON/AGG’s Tech Experience zone.  The finalists had to pitch their ideas to three judges in one of the white Tech Experience domes.

The competition had a tough brief: to create a transportation system for the US that will meet the needs of all users in the year 2050 and beyond.

“We have an overall initiative called Infrastructure Vision 2050. The goal is to foster conversation about a long-term plan for US infrastructure,” explained Kate Fox Wood, AEM campaign director for the initiative. “To engage people in the initiative, we decided to launch this challenge.”

The winning idea came from post-graduate students Anthony Barrs and Baiyu Chen (pictured) from the University of California, Berkeley. Their proposal, ‘Hyperlane: global supply chain’s final mile’, combines concepts of high-speed rail, road and dynamic pricing as used in the energy sector.

Autonomous vehicles would pay to go on the Hyperlane at speeds of 120 mph which would increase capacity by a factor of four. At the heart of this system is a Dynamic Pricing Engine which means that costs rise with demand. “We did some research on dynamic pricing in the energy market and discovered that when it’s introduced, people don’t use less energy they change their behaviours,” said Barrs.

The winners receive $50,000 in prize money: “We’re still in school so we’re going to use part of the $50,000 to fund our education. But now we can focus on expanding this project to make it into reality,” said Chen.

Second-placed and receiving $35,000 was Peter Muller, of PRT Consulting, Franktown, who proposed a development of automated transport network (ATN) systems such as that operating at London’s Heathrow airport, but with increased speeds and capacities.

“It’s easier to do than driverless cars,” said Muller. “As costs go down, this can be commercially viable and profitable in their own right which means that they can be built and funded using public private partnerships.”

Kevin Lu,of Pyro-E, from Oakland, came third with his Adaptive Pavement Systems which uses solid-state technologies to create temporary ‘speed bumps’ in the road in order to control speeds and increase capacity. “The goal is to make infrastructure smarter and make roads talk to each other,” said Lu.

Finalist Jeremy Martinez, a psychiatrist who works in the field of addiction in Los Angeles, came up with the idea of Monorail 2050. He suggests that private developers build mixed-use developments and fund monorails that run between the developments.

Micheal Ahimbisibwe, of Bravespec Systems, from Kampala, Uganda put forward ‘Direct Drive System: An intelligible road infrastructure concept’.

Ahimbisibwe imagines a controlling ‘brain’ which organises every car journey allocating time slots and setting speeds, using technology that already exists – with the exception of 5G which is needed to provide sufficient bandwidth. On his first visit to the US from his native Uganda, Ahimisibwe admitted to surprise at the state of US roads which he said are “not up to the standard I expected”.

Host of the event Vivek Wadhwa from Carnegie Mellon University’s College of Engineering praised AEM’s “experiment” in inviting people from outside the industry to suggest solutions. He added that the five finalists had “all sorts of crazy ideas” but clarified: “Crazy is good by the way – we want more people with crazy ideas.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • AEM proposes highway funding solutions
    February 15, 2012
    The Association of Equipment Manufacturers (AEM) is offering a novel solution to funding sources for the US Highway Bill.
  • Training as well as test equipment is a must for emerging markets
    April 27, 2015
    Emerging markets, such as North and East Africa, are developing an appetite for materials testing equipment, but suppliers need to provide expertise and training as well as a broad range of machines, as Kristina Smith finds out Asking what sort of testing equipment is required for Africa is a little bit like asking what sort of food Europeans like to eat. The answer is that requirements vary enormously from the most basic and ancient of tests to the very cutting edge of dynamic testing. “You have some
  • Road user charging, the way to highway investment?
    February 27, 2012
    Tough political decisions have to be made to ensure highway investment - *Dr Max Lay reports
  • Road user charging, the way to highway investment?
    April 12, 2012
    Tough political decisions have to be made to ensure highway investment - *Dr Max Lay reports Our road systems and how we use them have changed dramatically over the last few centuries, and yet some problems persist and others reappear. For most of human history roads have been used by foot traffic and by cumbersome wagons hauled at walking pace. Roads were built to provide some obvious advantage in commerce or conquest. They were then grudgingly maintained by those who might gain some advantage from the