Skip to main content

Worldwide action call on TRB barrier resolution

Highway authorities worldwide are being asked to take action on a Transportation Research Board (TRB) committee resolution.
February 16, 2012 Read time: 2 mins

Highway authorities worldwide are being asked to take action on a 2774 Transportation Research Board (TRB) committee resolution.

Earlier this year, the TRB AFB20 (2) Roadside Design Subcommittee on International Research approved the END Turned-Down ENDs resolution, which encourages road authorities to stop the use of fishtail, spoons or turned-down guardrail terminals and to use only crashworthy end treatments for their steel guardrail and concrete longitudinal barriers.

The traffic barrier ends resolution noted: "Turned-down terminals were developed and introduced in the 1960s to eliminate spearing of the rail into the passenger compartment of the impacting vehicle that often occurred with the fishtail or spoon full height, stand-up ends. While turned-down terminals were an improvement over the fishtail or spoon terminals, both field experience and full-scale crash testing have shown that vehicle roll over or launching is likely with turned-down terminals under high-speed impact conditions."

Based on observed crash test performance and reported field experience, the AFB20 (2) Subcommittee recommends that road authorities in all countries immediately prohibit new installations of fishtail or spoon terminals as well as turned-down terminals on the approach end of concrete barriers or steel beam guardrails on roads with operating speeds in excess of 80km/hour unless these ends are outside the defined clear zone and in other locations where end-on high-speed impacts are unlikely to occur or otherwise shielded from potential impacts.

"It is understood that system-wide replacement of existing turned-down ends or fishtail or spoon terminals, while beneficial, may not be practical or economically feasible. For new terminal installations at these locations road authorities should only specify the use of crashworthy terminals that have met appropriate testing criteria such as NCHRP 350 [National Cooperative Highway Research Program], MASH [Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware] or [European] EN 1317 (or their updates)," says the resolution.

"During any road construction restoration, rehabilitation and resurfacing projects, existing terminals should be updated with terminals that meet NCHRP 350, MASH or EN 1317 (or their updates) criteria.

"Turned-down terminals and fishtail terminals remain appropriate for trailing (downstream) ends of traffic barriers on divided highways and in other locations where end-on high-speed impacts are unlikely to occur.

"The Transportation Research Board AFB20(2) Roadside Design Subcommittee on International Research recognises the importance of the use of tested, state-of-the-art safety hardware and advocates the immediate implementation of of this resolution to make roads safer around the world."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • TERTU has MASH!
    March 1, 2022
    Environmentally-friendly guardrail wins MASH certification
  • Improving barrier safety for motorcyclists
    February 23, 2012
    Mike Woof reports on delays to better barrier safety for Europe’s powered two wheeler riders. Safety for vulnerable road users continues to be a matter of some debate in Europe. Although powered two wheelers account for a comparatively small number of Europe’s vehicles as well as total distance travelled, they account for a disproportionately large number of accidents. Statistical data shows that by far the greatest risk to users of powered two wheelers as well as other vulnerable road users comes from driv
  • Concrete barriers help to minimise accidents
    July 12, 2012
    Concrete barriers offer a highway safety solution - Mike Woof writes. Concrete safety barriers are being installed on many of Europe's major highways, particularly for use as centre lane dividers. The strength and durability of concrete barriers can help reduce the risk of cross over accidents, one of several topics raised at a conference in Brussels on concrete highway barriers organised by the European Concrete Paving Association, EUPAVE. The conference was opened by Yves Deceoene of the IRF's Belgian ex
  • Motorcycle-Guardrail Crashes: How can the risk of severe injury and fatality be reduced?
    July 23, 2012
    The problem: motorcyclist fatalities can occur from a variety of accidents. But in the United States in 2005, motorcyclists comprised 42% of fatalities due to guardrail collisions, whereas only 3% of vehicles on the roads were motorcycles (Gabler, 2007). More motorcyclists were killed in guardrail collisions than passengers of any other vehicle type in 2005 (Gabler, 2007). Guardrails cannot simply be removed to protect motorcyclists. However, improvements need to be made in several areas in order to keep mo