Skip to main content

Worldwide action call on TRB barrier resolution

Highway authorities worldwide are being asked to take action on a Transportation Research Board (TRB) committee resolution.
February 16, 2012 Read time: 2 mins

Highway authorities worldwide are being asked to take action on a 2774 Transportation Research Board (TRB) committee resolution.

Earlier this year, the TRB AFB20 (2) Roadside Design Subcommittee on International Research approved the END Turned-Down ENDs resolution, which encourages road authorities to stop the use of fishtail, spoons or turned-down guardrail terminals and to use only crashworthy end treatments for their steel guardrail and concrete longitudinal barriers.

The traffic barrier ends resolution noted: "Turned-down terminals were developed and introduced in the 1960s to eliminate spearing of the rail into the passenger compartment of the impacting vehicle that often occurred with the fishtail or spoon full height, stand-up ends. While turned-down terminals were an improvement over the fishtail or spoon terminals, both field experience and full-scale crash testing have shown that vehicle roll over or launching is likely with turned-down terminals under high-speed impact conditions."

Based on observed crash test performance and reported field experience, the AFB20 (2) Subcommittee recommends that road authorities in all countries immediately prohibit new installations of fishtail or spoon terminals as well as turned-down terminals on the approach end of concrete barriers or steel beam guardrails on roads with operating speeds in excess of 80km/hour unless these ends are outside the defined clear zone and in other locations where end-on high-speed impacts are unlikely to occur or otherwise shielded from potential impacts.

"It is understood that system-wide replacement of existing turned-down ends or fishtail or spoon terminals, while beneficial, may not be practical or economically feasible. For new terminal installations at these locations road authorities should only specify the use of crashworthy terminals that have met appropriate testing criteria such as NCHRP 350 [National Cooperative Highway Research Program], MASH [Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware] or [European] EN 1317 (or their updates)," says the resolution.

"During any road construction restoration, rehabilitation and resurfacing projects, existing terminals should be updated with terminals that meet NCHRP 350, MASH or EN 1317 (or their updates) criteria.

"Turned-down terminals and fishtail terminals remain appropriate for trailing (downstream) ends of traffic barriers on divided highways and in other locations where end-on high-speed impacts are unlikely to occur.

"The Transportation Research Board AFB20(2) Roadside Design Subcommittee on International Research recognises the importance of the use of tested, state-of-the-art safety hardware and advocates the immediate implementation of of this resolution to make roads safer around the world."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Specifying barriers correctly for optimum roadway safety
    April 29, 2015
    Mike Dreznes, executive vice president at the International Road Federation (IRF) discusses the proper utilisation of longitudinal barriers as a road safety priority Road authorities have a duty of care to ensure infrastructure not only meets safety requirements but provides protection for all road users. Crash barriers play an essential role in maximising safety, lowering the risk of sudden impact for road users and also allowing redirective capabilities. If a road authority has a rigid hazard locate
  • Specifying barriers correctly for optimum roadway safety
    April 29, 2015
    Mike Dreznes, executive vice president at the International Road Federation (IRF) discusses the proper utilisation of longitudinal barriers as a road safety priority Road authorities have a duty of care to ensure infrastructure not only meets safety requirements but provides protection for all road users. Crash barriers play an essential role in maximising safety, lowering the risk of sudden impact for road users and also allowing redirective capabilities.
  • IRF launches campaign to phase out deadly terminals
    June 14, 2012
    Road authorities and safety specialists worldwide recognise that the most dangerous part of a longitudinal barrier is the end. A crashworthy end treatment must be able to act both as a redirecting anchor and an impact cushion to errant motorists. The highway safety community has responded to this engineering challenge through continuous investment in innovation over the past 50 years. The resulting “crashworthy” terminals commercially available today reduce the deceleration and avoid ramping, rolling or pit
  • The AFB20 (2) Roadside Safety Sub-committee urges more cooperation
    November 17, 2015
    The AFB20 (2) Roadside Safety Sub-committee on International Research Activities calls for closer cooperation between road authorities and the industry On 15 September 2015, the AFB20 (2) Roadside Safety Sub-committee on International Research Activities held its third European workshop in Istanbul, Turkey.