Skip to main content

Vast majority of Americans oppose raising gas tax

A majority of Americans believe new transportation projects should be paid for with user-fees instead of tax increases, according to a new national Reason-Rupe poll of 1,200 adults on cell phones and land lines.
May 2, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
A majority of Americans believe new transportation projects should be paid for with user-fees instead of tax increases, according to a new national Reason-Rupe poll of 1,200 adults on cell phones and land lines.

The Reason-Rupe poll finds 77 per cent of Americans oppose increasing the federal gas tax, while just 19 per cent favour raising the tax, which is currently 18.4 cents a gallon. The public thinks the government wastes the gas tax money it already receives. Sixty-five per cent say the government spends transportation funding ineffectively, and just 23 say money is spent effectively.

The survey shows Americans believe new roads and highways should be paid for by the people driving on them: 58 per cent of Americans say new roads and highways should be funded by tolls. Twenty-eight per cent say new road capacity should be paid for by tax increases.

The Reason-Rupe poll finds broad support for user-fees. If a toll road would save drivers a ‘significant’ amount of time, 59 per cent of Americans say they would pay to use it. And 57 per cent favour converting carpool lanes, or high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, into high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes. Voters are much-less supportive of variably-priced toll lanes, however. Half of those surveyed oppose, and 39 per cent favour, variably-priced tolls that rise and fall with traffic levels.

In terms of transportation spending priorities, 62 per cent want to prioritise funding for road and highway projects, while 30 per cent want to prioritise funding for mass transit projects.

Related Content

  • ARTBA warns of shortfall in funding for US highways
    February 14, 2014
    According to the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA), fixing the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) without generating any new revenue will be highly challenging. ARTBA president Pete Ruane told a Senate panel that such a move would require the equivalent of the US Congress passing and the president signing a 2013-level Murray-Ryan budget deal every year. And this would be sufficient just to maintain current highway and transit programme investment levels. According to a new Congressional Bud
  • Tougher sentences for driving offenders?
    August 2, 2012
    A survey carried out by the UK’s Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) points to tougher sentencing for driving offenders. According to the survey, 80% of respondents said that repeat drink drive offenders should have their vehicles seized and sold or scrapped. The poll also said that 50% of respondents think that this should also happen to drivers caught several times over the limit. The respondents were also behind reducing the drink-drive limit, with 66% wanting to see the limit reduced. Most said it sho
  • Recession impact report on worldwide infrastructure spending
    May 10, 2012
    A new report examines how aggressive government belt-tightening and financial market deleveraging restrained worldwide infrastructure investments for 2012 and probably for the next five years. In the US, for instance, Infrastructure2012: Spotlight on Leadership, released by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and Ernst & Young, says that constrained public budgets and a growing recognition at the local level of the importance of infrastructure, combined with lack of action at the federal level, are causing state
  • Implementing road user charging
    February 14, 2012
    Oregon Department of Transportation's James Whitty spoke with Jason Barnes on the state's progress with VMT fee-based charging