Skip to main content

US highway bill

After long delays the US Government has finally signed its highway reauthorisation bill. “This is a good, bipartisan bill that will create jobs, strengthen our transportation system and grow our economy,” said US transportation secretary Ray LaHood. “It builds on our safety efforts. The bill also provides states and communities with two years of steady funding to build the roads, bridges and transit systems they need.” Funds for transportation projects will come from the Highway Trust Fund as well as genera
August 13, 2012 Read time: 2 mins

After long delays the US Government has finally signed its highway reauthorisation bill. “This is a good, bipartisan bill that will create jobs, strengthen our transportation system and grow our economy,” said US transportation secretary Ray LaHood. “It builds on our safety efforts. The bill also provides states and communities with two years of steady funding to build the roads, bridges and transit systems they need.”

Funds for transportation projects will come from the Highway Trust Fund as well as general taxation. The highway bill gives states more leeway on how to use the federal highway funds as they can opt out from using the money on non-road items and focus on highway projects. But the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) has been sparing with its praise for the bill. ARTBA president and CEO Pete Ruane said “In the short term, the bill will provide stability in federal funding for state and local transportation projects.

The elimination of earmarks should also accelerate the speed at which federal funds impact the market for transportation improvements. That’s the good news. The bad news is there is no new money. And even with their federal funds, we are now in a situation where 28 states have invested less in highway and bridge projects over the past 12 months than they did in pre-recession 2008, even when adjusted for inflation. We view this bill—as we believe congressional leaders do—as just ‘Step One,’ which is making the significant program and policy reforms needed to restore public confidence in how the federal government is investing their money in transportation and mobility. ‘Step Two’ is coming to grips with how to fund the nation’s investments in transportation infrastructure and mobility over the longer term. That tough job remains.”

Related Content

  • Many US states don't measure performance of transportation investments
    February 29, 2012
    US States spent an estimated $131 billion on transportation in fiscal year 2010, but many cannot answer critical questions about what returns this investment is generating, according to a new report by the Pew Centre on the States and the Rockefeller Foundation
  • New move could speed delivery of US transport projects
    February 14, 2017
    A recent decision by the US Army Corps of Engineers could help speed the delivery of transportation projects. The decision was to exempt the Nationwide Permit (NWP) programme from an Executive Order freezing regulatory activity by federal agencies. And the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) believes that this will clear a path for the development of transportation projects, helping to boost the construction sector as a result. The NWP program, which was reauthorised by the Obama
  • Caterpillar CEO Doug Oberhelman has reinforced need for US infrastructure investment
    July 15, 2014
    Caterpillar Chairman and CEO Doug Oberhelman has outlined the risks to US competitiveness if the US Government proves unable to agree on both short and long term infrastructure funding issues. "American companies implement just-in-time inventory and on-demand supply chains. We produce vehicles and machines with greater fuel efficiency and lower carbon emissions. We lead the world in innovation, inventing better products and better processes," Oberhelman wrote in an article headlined "Congress must move on t
  • AfPA alarmed over Australia’s new funding split
    November 17, 2023
    The Australian Flexible Pavement Association says the federal government’s plan for a 50:50 split with states and territories is highly “controversial” and comes amid major road and rail project cancellations.