Skip to main content

Tougher sentences for driving offenders?

A survey carried out by the UK’s Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) points to tougher sentencing for driving offenders. According to the survey, 80% of respondents said that repeat drink drive offenders should have their vehicles seized and sold or scrapped. The poll also said that 50% of respondents think that this should also happen to drivers caught several times over the limit. The respondents were also behind reducing the drink-drive limit, with 66% wanting to see the limit reduced. Most said it sho
August 2, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
RSSA survey carried out by the UK’s 5125 Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) points to tougher sentencing for driving offenders. According to the survey, 80% of respondents said that repeat drink drive offenders should have their vehicles seized and sold or scrapped. The poll also said that 50% of respondents think that this should also happen to drivers caught several times over the limit. The respondents were also behind reducing the drink-drive limit, with 66% wanting to see the limit reduced. Most said it should be lowered to a maximum of 50mg of alcohol/100ml of blood. A further 28% called for tougher sentences still, with a zero-tolerance policy. People convicted of drink driving generally lose their licence for a year and receive an average fine of €304 (£240). The survey said that 57% think this is too weak, and that punishments for drink drivers should be tougher, with 38% saying they should be much tougher. In additions, 55% of poll respondents support a proportionate, graduated system of penalties, if the limit was reduced. For example, lower penalties would be given to drivers caught under the current limit, but above the new one. Almost half of respondents admit to having a drink while driving, within the current limit. Some 79% say a decrease in the limit wouldn’t affect their enjoyment of an evening out, while 19% said it would. However, 84% said a reduction in the limit wouldn’t change their plans to go out.

IAM chief executive Simon Best said, “The support is there for tougher treatment of drink drivers. Not only do the majority want a lower limit – they also want tougher punishment for those that break the law, especially the worst offenders who present the greatest danger to other road users, their passengers and themselves. Our poll shows a desire to see more effective drink drive levels as well as much greater consistency of enforcement, prosecution, and sentencing, which reflects the level of danger associated with drinking drivers.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • India's road safety management innovations
    February 27, 2012
    Rohit Baluja is a man with a mission, and that is to help reduce the grim accident toll on India's roads, the worst in the world. Baluja, a shoemaker by trade, has been studying for a PhD in civil engineering, and this has involved regular trips to Birmingham, UK, to complete his doctorate. All this seems far removed from 18 years ago when in December 1991, using much of his own money, he founded the Institute of Road Traffic Education (IRTE), the only organisation in India that conducts accident investiga
  • Traffic management drives sustainability
    June 18, 2012
    New initiatives could boost transport sustainability – David Crawford writes. New roles are opening up for urban traffic management systems in helping city authorities to meet increasingly stringent governmental and supra-governmental air quality standards. European local authorities are typically tasked with both traffic management and pollution monitoring within their areas, making them well placed to draw on the latter to mitigate the impacts of the former.
  • Call for road pricing system in Austria
    April 23, 2012
    The Austrian Industrial Association (IV) has called for a road pricing system under which drivers would pay less for owning a car but more for using it. This could lower CO2 emissions. The IV's general secretary Peter Koren said that currently those who d
  • Campaigners support smoking ban in all cars
    July 12, 2012
    The UK charity Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) believes smoking should be banned in cars because of concerns that children inhale second-hand smoke if their parents smoke while driving. Such a ban already exists in the US, South Africa and various parts of Canada, although in the UK it currently only applies to commercial vehicles. It is understood that increasing the ban to include smoking in all cars would be supported by the road safety charity, Brake. It thinks smoking while driving often means that