Skip to main content

Slovakia’s troubled D1 highway

Slovakia’s Ministry of Transport is to finance construction work on the 75km section of D1 highway between Martin and Presov from state funds, with work expected to start in the second quarter of 2011.
February 20, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
2875 Slovakia’s Ministry of Transport is to finance construction work on the 75km section of D1 highway between Martin and Presov from state funds, with work expected to start in the second quarter of 2011.

The move towards state funding is a major change in policy as the highway was originally planned to be paid for through a PPP by the Slovenske Dialnice consortium, which had won the concession for the project.

However, the deal was cancelled and Slovenske Dialnice has said it will dispute a €10 million fine being imposed by the Ministry for allegedly not being able to secure finance for the construction and operation of the Martin-Presov section.

Slovak construction firm 2877 Doprastav, which was part of the Slovenske Dialnice consortium, said that it secured finance worth €1.66 billion from 18 commercial banks. Of this, €1 billion was from the 1054 European Investment Bank (EIB); €190 million from the 1166 European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and €379 million from other sources. The total finances available for the project totalled €3.23 billion, which was sufficient for the project, according to Doprastav.

The construction companies claim the project failed due to objections stemming from environmental groups, for which the government is responsible, and the EIB and EBRD expressed concern over the D1 project when the environmental issues were revealed.

Questions were raised regarding the legality of the environmental impact assessment, which resulted in the project being scrutinised by the 2465 European Commission. After this the EIB and EBRD showed reservations as pushing ahead with the project as it stood could end in a legal tangle at the European Court of Justice.

Following elections in Slovakia a new administration took power and announced its concern over the cost of the D1 project, although the consortium did manage to reduce the budget required for the work by addressing bank interest charges. Responsibility for the original environmental impact assessment may prove to be the key to this complex legal tangle.

Related Content

  • Road pricing revenue a source of investment funds
    February 16, 2012
    When channelled back into the road sector, revenue from road charging is seen by many as a source of additional investment and research funds as Patrick Smith reports. Late in 2010, three major European organisations put out a policy statement calling for fair charging for greener, smarter and safer road infrastructure. ASECAP (the European toll road operators organisation); ERF (European Road Federation) and the IRU (International Road Transport Union), said that in recent years the concept of road chargin
  • EU biofuels strategy ‘criticised’
    July 3, 2012
    A NEW report revealed by the European Commission says that increasing the share of fuel used in transport beyond 5.6% could cause more harm than benefit to the environment. At the end of 2008 the EU agreed to set a target of 10% of transport fuel coming from renewable sources such as biofuels as well as hydrogen and ‘green’ electricity by 2020. The agreement also included a requirement that all new energy sources be sustainable, setting sustainability criteria for biofuels, and is this last point that is p
  • Key French highway upgrade deal for consortium
    March 5, 2012
    The French Government has agreed a highway contract with consortium Atlandes for a section of the A63 autoroute in southwest France.
  • Lithuania loan; funding found for road reconstruction
    September 29, 2016
    Plans to upgrade the Vilnius to Utena highway in Lithuania will now go ahead following the securing of a loan to help pay for the project. The €40 million loan is being sourced from the European Investment Bank (EIB). The loan will be for a period for 12 years, with guarantees being provided by the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI). In all, the work to upgrade the 72.15km A14 route between capital Vilnius and Utena will cost close to €91 million, with the Lithuania Road Administration (LRA) pla