Skip to main content

Slovakia’s troubled D1 highway

Slovakia’s Ministry of Transport is to finance construction work on the 75km section of D1 highway between Martin and Presov from state funds, with work expected to start in the second quarter of 2011.
February 20, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
2875 Slovakia’s Ministry of Transport is to finance construction work on the 75km section of D1 highway between Martin and Presov from state funds, with work expected to start in the second quarter of 2011.

The move towards state funding is a major change in policy as the highway was originally planned to be paid for through a PPP by the Slovenske Dialnice consortium, which had won the concession for the project.

However, the deal was cancelled and Slovenske Dialnice has said it will dispute a €10 million fine being imposed by the Ministry for allegedly not being able to secure finance for the construction and operation of the Martin-Presov section.

Slovak construction firm 2877 Doprastav, which was part of the Slovenske Dialnice consortium, said that it secured finance worth €1.66 billion from 18 commercial banks. Of this, €1 billion was from the 1054 European Investment Bank (EIB); €190 million from the 1166 European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and €379 million from other sources. The total finances available for the project totalled €3.23 billion, which was sufficient for the project, according to Doprastav.

The construction companies claim the project failed due to objections stemming from environmental groups, for which the government is responsible, and the EIB and EBRD expressed concern over the D1 project when the environmental issues were revealed.

Questions were raised regarding the legality of the environmental impact assessment, which resulted in the project being scrutinised by the 2465 European Commission. After this the EIB and EBRD showed reservations as pushing ahead with the project as it stood could end in a legal tangle at the European Court of Justice.

Following elections in Slovakia a new administration took power and announced its concern over the cost of the D1 project, although the consortium did manage to reduce the budget required for the work by addressing bank interest charges. Responsibility for the original environmental impact assessment may prove to be the key to this complex legal tangle.

Related Content

  • Bosnia tunnel project; work starting
    November 1, 2019
    Construction work is due to start on the Prenj Tunnel project in Bosnia. The tunnel will form part of the important Corridor 5C route. Measuring 10km in length, the road and tunnel project is expected to cost €820 million to build. Funding is being supplied jointly by the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). The Bosnian Government has also secured a portion of the necessary funding from Bosnian banks. In addition, a contract has been agreed for the
  • Czech republic needs more investment in road safety
    July 11, 2012
    In 2001, the European Commission set the ambitious goal of halving the deaths on Europe's roads by 2010. While significant progress has been made over the years, it is clear that only a few countries are expected to reach this target. More needs to be done! The Brussels Programme Centre of the International Road Federation (IRF BPC®), as a signatory to the European Road Safety Charter, has over the years been actively involved in the efforts to improve road safety and reduce fatalities.
  • Romania gets EIB funds
    February 20, 2012
    Funding worth nearly €600 million from the European Investment Bank (EIB) could help improve Romania’s national road network.
  • Australian state government does a deal with East West Connect
    April 15, 2015
    The state government of Victoria in Australia will pay the East West Connect consortium US$258 million to cancel construction of Melbourne’s East West Link road tunnel. The payoff is to cover the consortium's bidding, design and pre-construction costs and draw a line under the deal that has been mired in financial controversy for years. The federal government slammed Victoria’s decision to bail out of the project as “an obscenity’’ that will cost 7000 jobs, according to a report in The Australian news