Polish budget switch

The EC is not keen for Poland to use rail funds for roads.
March 2, 2012 Read time: 1 min
The EC is not keen for Poland to use rail funds for roads. This became clear during talks between Poland's Ministry of Infrastructure and the 2465 European Commission (EC). This means that funds worth €1.2 billion originally allocated for rail projects will not be transferred to road spending. A final ruling by the EC has yet to be made, although Poland may appeal. The Polish Government wanted to reallocate the rail funds to the road programme to make up for budget spending cuts.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • On the road to commonality
    February 26, 2020
    Commonality for construction machine road use requirements is being suggested for Europe.
    Read More
  • Romanian road issues
    March 5, 2012
    Political controversy is looming with the revelation that Romania's National Road Company (CNADNR) has spent some €1.5 billion on upgrading 2,800 km of roads since 2004.
    Read More
  • Directive on road infrastructure safety management – to improve mobility safely
    September 12, 2018
    Better signs and more compliance leads to safer roads, says Christophe Nicodème, director general of the European Union Road Federation in the first of a regular new series of columns from ERF The Third Mobility Package launched by the European Commission represents the final piece of the “Europe on the Move Agenda” towards a modernisation of transport policy adapting to new decarbonisation and digitisation commitments. The package is composed of elements impacting various transport elements, among which
    Read More
  • Road maintenance cuts threatened for Malaysia
    August 6, 2012
    Highway managers in Malaysia face having their road maintenance funding slashed if they do not spend their current budgets. In a surprise announcement this week, the Malaysian government warned that states which “fail to manage and utilise funds allocated for road maintenance from the Federal Government risk having their provisions reduced in the future.”
    Read More

Highlighted Content