Skip to main content

New fuel economy targets could cut motoring costs in Europe

Europe’s drivers will be able to save enormous sums of money if ambitious fuel economy targets are introduced by the EU this July. This claim has been made by a former UK Environment Agency chief, Malcolm Fergusson. His study predicts that annual fuel costs for Europe’s drivers could fall by about 23% by 2020 if the currently expected EU fuel efficiency target of 95grammes of CO2 emissions/km for new cars and 147grammes/km for vans is confirmed by the European Commission in July, as expected. If the target
May 18, 2012 Read time: 3 mins

Europe’s drivers will be able to save enormous sums of money if ambitious fuel economy targets are introduced by the EU this July.

This claim has been made by a former UK 2759 Environment Agency chief, Malcolm Fergusson. His study predicts that annual fuel costs for Europe’s drivers could fall by about 23% by 2020 if the currently expected EU fuel efficiency target of 95grammes of CO2 emissions/km for new cars and 147grammes/km for vans is confirmed by the 2465 European Commission in July, as expected. If the target were to be tightened even further, to 60g/km by 2025, then fuel costs could fall by as much as 45%. The research was commissioned by 2499 Greenpeace, whose spokesperson, Franziska Achterberg, said: “The lesson from these figures is clear. A weakened law will pile hundreds of euros extra on drivers' fuel bills, while a strong one will do a lot to shield them from rocketing fuel prices.”

Greenpeace wants motorists to lobby their European Union representatives to support the measure. To arrive at his figures, Fergusson, who has previously reviewed CO2 emission reducing technologies for passenger cars in the EU looked at various scenarios for the UK based on differing emissions reductions technologies and different future fuel prices. Most ambitiously, an 80g/km target for 2020 coupled with a 60g/km goal in 2025 would cut 2030 fuel costs further still. For new cars, the savings figure would soar from £581/year under the 95g/km target in 2020 to an annual £1,216 under the ‘80g/km for 2020 and 60g/km for 2025’ scenario, in 2030.
If motorists save money they tend to drive further. So, Fergusson factored in a mileage increase of 20%. In this scenario, savings would still be made: between £465 under the 95g/km in 2020 picture, rising to £973 in 2030 under the 80g/60g hypothesis. Road transport currently accounts for 22% of the UK’s total carbon dioxide emissions, and an estimated 85% of that figure is attributed to fuel use and servicing operations, so backing this measure would also be of huge benefit to achieving the country's greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. Some automotive businesses are in favour of the 95grammes EU target and said the EU should set a non-binding target for 2025 to provide the car industry with investment security. But some manufacturers have protested about the targets, arguing that it would push up vehicle prices. Europe’s biggest carmaker, the 3503 Volkswagen Group, has described the 2020 target as “not based on sound impact assessment nor on a realistic appreciation of the costs and technical progress necessary to meet the goal within the timescale”.

EU car manufacturers are already on track to meet a 2015 target of 130grammes/km ahead of time, according to data collected by the International Council in Clean transportation, which shows that the average CO2 emissions level of new passenger cars in the EU was around 135g/km last year, a drop of 3.7% on 2010.

What the report does not explain however is how taxation income will be affected. With Europe’s governments all relying heavily on income from fuel taxes, improved fuel economy for the vehicle fleet will trigger a massive shortfall. It seems likely that the European countries will then have to introduce new taxes to offset the drop in income. While motoring may become cheaper as a result of the fuel economy gains, other taxes will offset those savings. And many more countries may consider systems for tolling or road user charging as a way to recoup funds for re-investment into road infrastructure.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • TISPOL 2017: Europe’s road safety record suffers as austerity bites hard
    December 21, 2017
    Police budgets are being slashed, staff numbers are falling and Europe’s long-term trend towards ever-fewer road deaths has ground to a halt. Does Europe’s road network face a far more dangerous future? Geoff Hadwick reports from TISPOL 2017 in Manchester, UK. Europe’s road safety record is under threat. Lower and lower funding levels have become a very serious, and very worrying, problem for the EU’s traffic police bosses. They know that they must find new ways to focus road users on changing their beha
  • Argentina's smart highways - still in the distance
    March 1, 2012
    Argentina's smart highway network plan, Red Federal de Autopistas en la Argentina (RFA), has still to be implemented.
  • Motorcycle-Guardrail Crashes: How can the risk of severe injury and fatality be reduced?
    July 23, 2012
    The problem: motorcyclist fatalities can occur from a variety of accidents. But in the United States in 2005, motorcyclists comprised 42% of fatalities due to guardrail collisions, whereas only 3% of vehicles on the roads were motorcycles (Gabler, 2007). More motorcyclists were killed in guardrail collisions than passengers of any other vehicle type in 2005 (Gabler, 2007). Guardrails cannot simply be removed to protect motorcyclists. However, improvements need to be made in several areas in order to keep mo
  • Bitumen technology: counting carbon emissions from road works
    March 13, 2024
    This month we look at accurate carbon counting, a biobinder that does not come at a premium and efforts to increase recycled content - Kristina Smith reports