Skip to main content

Highways UK event highlights the time for change for Highways England

The planning of strategic highways in England is locked into a two-tier mentality that is not good for the economy or for society. It is time to change. That is the message that David Quarmby, former chair of the RAC Foundation and head of RJRF’s Major Roads for the Future study, will be bringing to Highways UK, the landmark new roads conference at ExCel, London, 25th-26th November. In his keynote address Quarmby will argue that while welcome new funds, a new planning regime and a new arm’s length ro
November 13, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
The planning of strategic highways in England is locked into a two-tier mentality that is not good for the economy or for society. It is time to change.

That is the message that David Quarmby, former chair of the 5521 RAC Foundation and head of RJRF’s Major Roads for the Future study, will be bringing to 8269 Highways UK, the landmark new roads conference at ExCel, London, 25th-26th November.

In his keynote address Quarmby will argue that while welcome new funds, a new planning regime and a new arm’s length role are in place for 8100 Highways England, local transport planning is stuck in an age of austerity despite being of enormous economic significance for the whole of the UK. The huge changes currently happening in governance, funding, and strategy at Highways England make this a once-in-a-generation opportunity to close the gap between the haves and the have-nots, to create a truly connected, flexible, responsive, road network, fir for purpose to support England’s economy – north and south.

Quarmby believes that the solution to the ‘transport gap’ is apparent. “We need to start thinking about planning in a wholly new way, to think in terms of a Major Road Network that combines Highways England’s Strategic Road Network and the major ‘strategic’ roads controlled by councils,” he said. “That is the only way we can deliver a road system that is responsive to the economic needs of the country at every level.”

Mapping out such a major Road Network could be politically challenging, but Quarmby and his team believe that evidence and analysis can set the terms. “The data we have now on road users is rich,” he said. “We can analyse the economic significance of a particular road, relate it to the regional growth agenda for that area, and argue for it to be included in England’s Major Road Network.”

Using these methods the study team led by Quarmby for the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund has outlined a Major Road Network that is 90% larger than the current Strategic Road Network.

What the Major Road Network idea does not imply is any change in responsibilities. Quarmby will argue that the current division of responsibilities could remain in place, making a transition to the new approach much simpler. But funding would have to reflect the economic significance of the more than 6,400km of additional local roads, perhaps drawing on funds within the new Road Fund due to come into place in 2020, currently assumed to be designated only for Highways England. Planning will have to be cooperative across sectors.

Looking forward, the Major Road Network needs to be fit for purpose.  Quarmby’s study is working through the implications for future levels of demand for private and commercial transport; the effects of profound technological change that within the next two decades will revolutionise the capability of road vehicles, the role of the driver, and their interactions with the highway; how road safety can and will be improved; and the implications of technology change for air quality. Changes in governance of transport through devolution will transform decision-making and planning.

The Highways UK conference which brings together senior figures from every corner of the highways world and central and local government, is the place to start comprehending these immense changes. 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • “It’s road maintenance stupid,” MEP Michael Cramer tells pavement preservation and recycling summit PPRS Paris 2015
    February 23, 2015
    Road owners around the world “need a highway to heaven” according to Michael Cramer MEP, chairman of the European Parliament transport committee. Speaking at PPRS Paris 2015, the pavement preservation and recycling summit, Cramer said that Europe’s current road policy “lies somewhere between AC/DC’s Highway to Hell and Led Zeppelin’s Stairway to Heaven” and that, to mis-quote Bill Clinton, the EU needs to start thinking “it’s road maintenance stupid” whenever the subject of highway investment is under consi
  • Set the ALARM for repairs in England and Wales
    January 10, 2019
    More than 3,900km of roads in England and Wales will need essential maintenance within the next year, according to the annual ALARM survey* Cash-strapped local governments are reporting that the gap between the funds they received and the amount they needed for repairs and maintenance was almost €639 million. This equated to an average shortfall of €3.75 million for every authority. It would take 14 years to get local roads back into a reasonable steady state, but only if adequate funds and resources wer
  • Innovation is delivering better mobility systems: highlights from the IRF Annual Conference 2023
    January 7, 2024

    The IRF Annual Conference 2023 proved to be once again an enlightening experience for the road and transport community, welcoming participants from 105 countries, and 40 distinguished speakers from leading organisations including the IDB, UNECA, the World Bank, ERTICO, ASECAP and many more.

  • Australia bites the bullet on roads reform
    August 2, 2012
    Predictions of impending doom for Australia's roads infrastructure have given the nation's governments and roads stakeholders the fright they needed to collaborate on roads policy. If the latest initiatives Australia is putting in place do produce the full extent of the roads reform required, there will be some lessons there for the whole world Whether through pride or stubbornness, or a combination of both, each state and territory of Australia has always liked to do things its own way. To some extent and