Skip to main content

Europe’s drive for safer roads sets new targets

Europe’s drive for improved road safety will see new targets being set. Previous ambitious plans to reduce road casualty rates have not been achieved, so new strategies are being devised. The European Transport Safety Commission (ETSC) is setting out its latest plans. In 2010, the European Union renewed its commitment to improve road safety by setting a target of reducing road deaths by 50% by 2020, compared to 2010 levels. This target followed an earlier target set in 2001 to halve road deaths by 2010. A n
January 9, 2019 Read time: 3 mins

Europe’s drive for improved road safety will see new targets being set. Previous ambitious plans to reduce road casualty rates have not been achieved, so new strategies are being devised. The 5801 European Transport Safety Commission (ETSC) is setting out its latest plans. In 2010, the European Union renewed its commitment to improve road safety by setting a target of reducing road deaths by 50% by 2020, compared to 2010 levels. This target followed an earlier target set in 2001 to halve road deaths by 2010. A new target to halve road deaths by 2030 compared to 2020 levels was announced by the European Commission on 17th May 2018, alongside a target to reduce serious injuries for the first time by 50% between 2020 and 2030.

However, progress has been sluggish. Road deaths in the EU fell by just 2% in 2017 compared to 2016: 25,300 people lost their lives on the EU roads in 2017, a figure that has hardly changed in four years.

New strategies include the introduction of new vehicle safety standards and updated rules on road infrastructure safety management and a strategy for automated driving.

The ETSC says it hopes that the long-awaited impetus of the third mobility package could contribute to resuming road safety improvement soon and driving progress in the next decade. It points out that alongside legal and moral obligations, there is a strong economic case to include the prevention of road traffic deaths and serious injuries in EU health policy as well as transport.

Both deaths and serious injuries carry a huge cost to society, as the ETSC highlights. Given the financial difficulties that many EU countries face, the value to society of improving road safety should be taken into account in the policy and budgetary planning process, expressing in monetary terms the moral imperative of reducing road risk. It should be clear to policy-makers that road safety policies are a sound investment.

The political will to improve on recent poor progress until 2020 is important. The lack of it at EU Member State level has contributed to a decline in levels of police enforcement, a failure to invest in safer infrastructure and limited action on tackling speed and drink driving in a number of countries.

The ETSC is urging the Romanian presidency of the EU to finalise conclusions on the infrastructure safety management directive and the driving and resting hours regulation as well as the budget instruments before European parliamentary elections.

Due to the end of the current mandate of the European Parliament and European Commission, the presidency will be under even greater pressure to deliver results within a very tight timeframe. Moreover, it will be dealing with finalising a backlog of proposals issued by the European Commission very late into this term. Road safety benefits must be prioritised when deciding how to juggle this busy workload.

The Romanian presidency should acknowledge the strong return on investment of road safety improvements and prioritise life-saving measures at EU and national level. It should use the opportunity of its presidency to pursue key aims. The ETSC points out that leadership is needed in adopting the new EU legislations on infrastructure safety and the EU budget. It also says that there should be a focus on national budgetary spending for priorities that can have an impact quickly, such as enforcement and high-risk site management of infrastructure. In addition, the ETSC says the presidency should encourage EU Member States to stay tough on enforcement both in terms of budgets and showing political leadership.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • IRF calls for action on road traffic noise
    July 12, 2012
    According to the European Union Directive 2002/49/EC relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise (END), the Member States of the European Union have committed to abide by a strict timetable of milestones and deliverables, all aimed at reducing current levels of noise and improving the life of Europe's citizens. As part of this overall strategy, European leaders were required to submit national noise action plans by 18 January of this year, targeting major roads and all agglomerations wi
  • Improved UK road safety required
    July 19, 2012
    Recent increases in road fatalities should be a wake-up call for the UK Government to step up and provide stronger leadership on road safety, say members of parliament in a report examining the Government's Strategic Framework for Road Safety.
  • UK developing plan to tackle driving under the influence of drugs
    March 22, 2012
    The UK Government is now working on a plan to address the road safety issues caused by driving under the influence of drugs. A panel of experts has been set up to evaluate the levels of various illegal drugs in the bloodstream that would affect driving ability.
  • PPRS speaker and MEP Cramer will urge more road maintenance
    February 3, 2015
    The chairman of the European Parliament’s transport committee wants an emphasis on road maintenance and finishing international connecting roads systems than on new grandiose highways. If national government’s fail to do this, as it’s their responsibility, then the European Union’s major cities can look forward to increasing gridlock in the coming decades. Congestion and maintenance are first and foremost the responsibility of member states and nobody wants to change this,” said Michael Cramer, chairm