Skip to main content

Driving safety courses prove safer

Research in the UK into drivers who opt to take speed awareness courses instead of taking points on their driving licence after an offence shows they are less likely to reoffend. The national speed awareness courses (NSAC) have been offered as an alternative for drivers after being caught speeding up to set values in excess of posted limits, instead of taking points on the licence. This system was introduced in the UK some years ago. Drivers taking the NSAC options have to pay £100 and are typically given a
May 15, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

Research in the UK into drivers who opt to take speed awareness courses instead of taking points on their driving licence after an offence shows they are less likely to reoffend. The national speed awareness courses (NSAC) have been offered as an alternative for drivers after being caught speeding up to set values in excess of posted limits, instead of taking points on the licence. This system was introduced in the UK some years ago. Drivers taking the NSAC options have to pay £100 and are typically given a combination of classroom sessions as well as time behind the wheel on the open road with an approved driving instructor alongside.

Data on 2.2 million drivers who have undergone the NSAC shows that they are 23% less likely to reoffend within six months after the first offence than those who have accepted up to points on their licence for speeding. And once a three year period has passed since the speeding offence, drivers who have taken the NSAC are 13% less likely to reoffend than those who have taken points on their licence.

The study also suggests further safety benefits for the NSAC. The report stated, “Given the observed relationship between reoffending rates and collision rates, and other research showing that greater compliance with speed limits reduces collision rates, it is considered probable that the participation in NSAC has positive road safety effects that could not be demonstrated due to the low statistical power of these sets of analyses.”

And the report also said, “NSAC has been found to reduce the reoffending rate (and other studies show that greater speed limit compliance reduces collisions), it may be reasonable to anticipate that participation in the course also encourages and facilitates safer driving behaviour generally, indirectly reducing the injury collision risk.”

Related Content

  • TISPOL: drink driving continues to be a pan-European concern
    January 18, 2016
    Drink-drive enforcement still has issues in Europe, according to pan-European police body TISPOL Drink-driving is the cause of around 5,000 road deaths in Europe. In the UK alone, it is estimated that 230 (14%) of the country’s 1,713 road deaths are due to drinking and driving. For England, Wales and Northern Ireland the limit for driving is still 80mg (0.8) of alcohol/100ml of blood. Scotland reduced its limit to 50mg (0.5) of alcohol/100ml of blood in December 2014, bringing it into line with most
  • Ford develops drug driving simulator
    November 20, 2015
    Ford has developed a special suit that simulates the effects of being under the influence of drugs for a driver. The novel Drug Driving Suit is intended to show drivers the dangers of driving under the influence of drugs such as cannabis, cocaine and heroin Research shows that drivers are up to 30 times more likely to be involved in a fatal crash after taking illegal drugs; the suit simulates effects that can include slowed reaction, distorted vision, and hand tremors.
  • Cutting speed to cut crashes and boost safety
    February 10, 2021
    Cutting speed can help cut crashes and boost safety.
  • Phone safety move addressed
    October 31, 2019
    The UK Government is closing a legal loophole that has allowed drivers to escape prosecution for hand-held mobile phone use while behind the wheel. At present, the law prevents drivers from using a hand-held mobile phone to call or text. However, people caught filming or taking photos while driving have escaped punishment. Lawyers have successfully argued this activity does not fit into the ‘interactive communication’ currently outlawed by the legislation. The revised legislation will mean any drive