CECE and CISMA check machines’ compliance at INTERMAT

Experts checked 45 stands at INTERMAT and found that seven were exhibiting machines not compliant with European Union regulations. CECE, the Committee for European Construction equipment, and CISMA, the French association of construction machinery manufacturers, toured the stands before the opening of the show.
April 24, 2015 Read time: 1 min

Experts checked 45 stands at INTERMAT and found that seven were exhibiting machines not compliant with European Union regulations. CECE, the 2440 Committee for European Construction equipment, and CISMA, the French association of construction machinery manufacturers, toured the stands before the opening of the show.

The inspecting delegation included experts from CISMA; a representative of the CECE office; a Paris court bailiff, and a representative from INTERMAT organisers, COMEXPOSIUM.

“During the inspection, CECE and CISMA explained to the companies the reasons why the machines they were exhibiting could not be legally sold in the EU market. Some companies agreed to indicate on the machines their lack of compliance with the EU relevant legislation. This is an evidence of their goodwill which we really appreciate,” said Eric Lepine, president of CECE.

Renaud Buronfosse, director of CISMA, said that at the 2012 event at least 30% more non-compliant machines had been found.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Securing safer transportation infrastructure through non-destructive technology
    June 16, 2014
    Kevin Vine reports on the use of non-destructive testing for structural analysis of bridges Seven years ago, the overpass collapse in Laval, Québec that led to the death of five people brought to light severe issues with the state of the country’s bridges and transportation infrastructure. More recently, a crack in the Champlain Bridge to Montreal that forced over 160,000 commuters to find alternate routes to work reaffirmed a need for greater emphasis on early detection before a crisis occurs.
    Read More
  • ASECAP: Cooperation needed for better toll-road risk management
    May 31, 2017
    Toll operators must offer a level of service for which drivers are prepared to pay because in many cases, drivers have alternative free-use routes. Incentives to attract drivers onto toll roads must include shorter and reliable journey times as well smooth and trouble free travel – all at an affordable price. Private companies running toll roads face the same difficulties as any other commercial entity, in particular financing construction before any toll revenue can be collected. Hardly surprising that fin
    Read More
  • ASECAP: Cooperation needed for better toll-road risk management
    May 31, 2017
    Toll operators must offer a level of service for which drivers are prepared to pay because in many cases, drivers have alternative free-use routes. Incentives to attract drivers onto toll roads must include shorter and reliable journey times as well smooth and trouble free travel – all at an affordable price. Private companies running toll roads face the same difficulties as any other commercial entity, in particular financing construction before any toll revenue can be collected. Hardly surprising that fin
    Read More
  • ASECAP: Cooperation needed for better toll-road risk management
    May 31, 2017
    Toll operators must offer a level of service for which drivers are prepared to pay because in many cases, drivers have alternative free-use routes. Incentives to attract drivers onto toll roads must include shorter and reliable journey times as well smooth and trouble free travel – all at an affordable price. Private companies running toll roads face the same difficulties as any other commercial entity, in particular financing construction before any toll revenue can be collected. Hardly surprising that fin
    Read More

Highlighted Content