Skip to main content

Britain’s local roads face severe degradation warns National Audit Office

The British government’s decision to cut back hard on its highways maintenance spending plans will severely degrade the quality of local roads across the UK and risk driving up the long-term costs for the country’s hard-pressed local authorities, the National Audit Office has warned in a new report out this month entitled “Funding for local transport.” The NAO has also told the UK’s ministers that they must be much clearer about who they think should take forward the decision-making process once the devolut
November 2, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
The British government’s decision to cut back hard on its highways maintenance spending plans will severely degrade the quality of local roads across the UK and risk driving up the long-term costs for the country’s hard-pressed local authorities, the 5285 National Audit Office has warned in a new report out this month entitled “Funding for local transport.”

The NAO has also told the UK’s ministers that they must be much clearer about who they think should take forward the decision-making process once the devolution of local major transport schemes has taken place.

The auditors are worried about how the 5432 Department for Transport (DfT) will ensure that the UK’s new local transport bodies – which will be made up of Local Enterprise Partnerships and councils – are going to be able to meet minimum standards. The DfT has also been urged to clarify how local transport data can be brought together to judge value for money.

Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, says “as the Department for Transport devolves more funding to a local level, it needs to make sure it has the appropriate assurance over the spending. It also needs a clear plan of action establishing how it will identify and intervene in cases of operational or financial failure in transport provision.”

The DfT has welcomed the NAO report, saying “we agree that in taking forward decentralisation it is important to ensure there is appropriate transparency and accountability at the right levels, to drive value for money. For example, we are applying these principles in developing the detailed assurance framework for devolution of local major transport schemes.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Carbon emissions discussion
    March 22, 2012
    Smarter steps to reduce carbon emissions are being proposed by a new study from The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport in the UK (CILT). With transport accounting for nearly 25% of the UK’s carbon emissions, and at a time when governments are agreeing to move forward together on reducing emissions, CILT is calling for a balanced approach to carbon management and better assessment of the carbon impact in making transport investment choices.
  • Drink driving a concern in Britain
    August 10, 2018
    The problem of drink driving is seeing an unwelcome upsurge on Britain’s road network. The latest official data reveals that casualties from drink driving are now on the increase. According to Department for Transport data, there were 9,040 people killed or seriously injured (KSI) as a result of drink driving on the British road network in 2016. Complete figures for 2017 have yet to be compiled but the trend appears to have continued. The KSI figures for 2016 represent a 7% increase over those for 2015 and
  • Certified safe: ARTBA president talks future highways and safety
    January 16, 2020
    What keeps Dave Bauer* up at night? David Arminas caught up with the head of ARTBA at his Washington D.C. office during daylight hours
  • London’s transportation network requires revolutionary approach to build capacity
    November 13, 2015
    London requires a radical new strategy to delivering the transportation development the city will need to cope with its fast growing population. Martin Tugwell, Transport Programme Director for England’s Economic Heartland Strategic Alliance said, “A road network fit for the world’s fifth largest economy cannot be planned from London: it is time for a revolution in approach, one that is focused on meeting our needs.”