Skip to main content

“Bold and brave” rallying call to cash-starved UK highway maintenance teams

UK local authorities and other organisations must be “bold and brave” in their structuring of repair and maintenance works, delegates at a key road engineering conference in Birmingham, central England were told. Speaking at the Developments in Pavement Assessment (DIPA 2012) event Les Hawker, highways manager at Transport for London (TfL), said: “There is no extra money and only 20% of the [Government budget] cuts have taken place so far. Over the next five years the other 80% of cuts will come through. Or
July 24, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
RSSUK local authorities and other organisations must be “bold and brave” in their structuring of repair and maintenance works, delegates at a key road engineering conference in Birmingham, central England were told.

Speaking at the Developments in Pavement Assessment (DIPA 2012) event Les Hawker, highways manager at 2387 Transport for London (TfL), said: “There is no extra money and only 20% of the [Government budget] cuts have taken place so far. Over the next five years the other 80% of cuts will come through. Organisations, including local authorities and contractors, have to be bold and brave in terms of their structuring of work.”

Director of environment and transport at Leicestershire County Council, Matthew Lugg, said the council’s decision to turn off thousands of street lamps across Leicestershire between midnight and 5am since 2010, and dim hundreds more between 7pm and 7am, was saving vital funds.

“We’ve had support from the public,” he said. “Everything we have done has gone through individual parishes. It’s the sort of thing we need to do in the current economic climate.”

During the recent one-day event organised by 2929 Fugro Aperio, Hawker also asked a panel of fellow senior highway maintenance specialists whether a lack of new engineering blood in local authority highway maintenance departments was having an impact on non-Highways Agency maintained road and associated infrastructure standards.

He said: “In days of investment there was always people coming into the profession and it did not affect the level of service. Unfortunately now I’m seeing people retiring and posts are being removed by local government. How do we address that? How do you deliver better services when there are no longer those experts? In London, there are boroughs which no longer have a light engineer.”

In response Lugg, who is also a special advisor to the HMEP (Highways Maintenance Efficiency Programme) at the Department of Transport, said: “Increasingly smaller authorities are not going to be able to retain the level of expertise that they had before because of cost. I think there will be more sharing of services across a wider area. For example, Wakefield [Metropolitan District Council] is buying in bridge engineering staff from Leeds [City Council].

“In my local authority I’ve not cut my [staff] training programme at all. At a time of recession you want better multi-skilled people. We are taking on graduates through an accredited scheme. You cannot turn the [employment] tap off completely.”

Amanda Richards, chair of the Interim Road Condition Steering Group, who gave DIPA 2012 delegates a presentation on the future role of UKPMS (UK Pavement Management System), said professional service contractors would have to be utilised more to make up for dwindling in-house engineering expertise, with local authorities left to “buy in” services when they needed them.

Meanwhile Herbert Micallef, asset investment planner at Transport for London (TfL), said there needed to be a “serious culture change” in the public sector. “To do more - that’s number one,” he added. “There will be centrally driven standards, such as what the HMEP (Highways Maintenance Efficiency Programme) is doing, for others to follow.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Philipp Swarovski lays down the marker
    June 10, 2019
    Swarco’s chief operating officer Philipp Swarovski shares his thoughts on highway safety and infrastructure in an age of uncertain future needs. David Arminas reports It was in Austria in 1969 when Manfred Swarovski opened his first glass bead factory. Five years later, operations started in the US. As the years rolled by there followed acquisitions and expansion of manufacturing facilities as well as a shift into intelligent transportation systems globally. Fast forward to 2019 and the family compan
  • Eurocode regulations assure conformity
    February 28, 2012
    A Europe without borders is an attractive prospect for the construction and design industries, claim supporters of Eurocodes. For all companies involved in the construction and infrastructure sectors, Swedish company Trelleborg for example, new Eurocode regulations will have decisive importance. So says Professor Haig Gulvanessian, one of the experts involved in developing the codes, which are a series of 10 European Standards (EN 1990-EN 1999) providing a common approach for the design of buildings and oth
  • Engineering Association of Malaysia and IRF team up for Regional
    April 1, 2016
    2nd IRF Asia Regional Congress & Exhibition. Jointly organised by the International Road Federation (IRF) and the Road Engineering Association of Malaysia (REAM), the 2nd IRF Asia Regional Congress & Exhibition (October 16-20, 2016 – Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) will once again be the premier event for the road sector and transportation professionals in the region. The Congress will provide a forum for showcasing best practices, new technologies, cutting edge research, and practical applications that can maximis
  • Gomaco smooth the way for new NY State concrete highway
    April 2, 2014
    When New York State Thruway wanted to experiment with unbonded concrete overlays, they chose an 8km, four-lane section of Interstate 90 near Hamburg as their test section. Surianello General Concrete, based in Buffalo, New York, won the bid to pave the 22.9cm thick concrete overlay. The age and the design of the original roadway created a major paving challenge. It was built in the 1950s and didn’t conform to current geometry requirements for superhighways. “They built it with a standard crown sectio