Skip to main content

“Bold and brave” rallying call to cash-starved UK highway maintenance teams

UK local authorities and other organisations must be “bold and brave” in their structuring of repair and maintenance works, delegates at a key road engineering conference in Birmingham, central England were told. Speaking at the Developments in Pavement Assessment (DIPA 2012) event Les Hawker, highways manager at Transport for London (TfL), said: “There is no extra money and only 20% of the [Government budget] cuts have taken place so far. Over the next five years the other 80% of cuts will come through. Or
July 24, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
RSSUK local authorities and other organisations must be “bold and brave” in their structuring of repair and maintenance works, delegates at a key road engineering conference in Birmingham, central England were told.

Speaking at the Developments in Pavement Assessment (DIPA 2012) event Les Hawker, highways manager at 2387 Transport for London (TfL), said: “There is no extra money and only 20% of the [Government budget] cuts have taken place so far. Over the next five years the other 80% of cuts will come through. Organisations, including local authorities and contractors, have to be bold and brave in terms of their structuring of work.”

Director of environment and transport at Leicestershire County Council, Matthew Lugg, said the council’s decision to turn off thousands of street lamps across Leicestershire between midnight and 5am since 2010, and dim hundreds more between 7pm and 7am, was saving vital funds.

“We’ve had support from the public,” he said. “Everything we have done has gone through individual parishes. It’s the sort of thing we need to do in the current economic climate.”

During the recent one-day event organised by 2929 Fugro Aperio, Hawker also asked a panel of fellow senior highway maintenance specialists whether a lack of new engineering blood in local authority highway maintenance departments was having an impact on non-Highways Agency maintained road and associated infrastructure standards.

He said: “In days of investment there was always people coming into the profession and it did not affect the level of service. Unfortunately now I’m seeing people retiring and posts are being removed by local government. How do we address that? How do you deliver better services when there are no longer those experts? In London, there are boroughs which no longer have a light engineer.”

In response Lugg, who is also a special advisor to the HMEP (Highways Maintenance Efficiency Programme) at the Department of Transport, said: “Increasingly smaller authorities are not going to be able to retain the level of expertise that they had before because of cost. I think there will be more sharing of services across a wider area. For example, Wakefield [Metropolitan District Council] is buying in bridge engineering staff from Leeds [City Council].

“In my local authority I’ve not cut my [staff] training programme at all. At a time of recession you want better multi-skilled people. We are taking on graduates through an accredited scheme. You cannot turn the [employment] tap off completely.”

Amanda Richards, chair of the Interim Road Condition Steering Group, who gave DIPA 2012 delegates a presentation on the future role of UKPMS (UK Pavement Management System), said professional service contractors would have to be utilised more to make up for dwindling in-house engineering expertise, with local authorities left to “buy in” services when they needed them.

Meanwhile Herbert Micallef, asset investment planner at Transport for London (TfL), said there needed to be a “serious culture change” in the public sector. “To do more - that’s number one,” he added. “There will be centrally driven standards, such as what the HMEP (Highways Maintenance Efficiency Programme) is doing, for others to follow.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • ACE/AECOM report: private sector and user-pay for English roads
    May 14, 2018
    It’s one minute to midnight for funding England’s roads, according to a timely new report, and the clock’s big hand is pointing to some form of user-pay solution, reports David Arminas Is there any way out of future user-pay funding for England’s highway infrastructure? The answer is a resounding ‘no’, according to the recently published report: Funding Roads for the Future. The brief 25-page document by the London-based Association for Consultancy and Engineering, ACE**, sums up the state of England’s ro
  • The radically changing face of UK highways management
    May 14, 2014
    The British Government policy paper ‘Action for Roads: A network for the 21st century’ sets out radical change to the strategic way roads are funded and managed – including plans to turn the Highways Agency into a Government-owned company and a pledge to invest over €33.4 billion (£28 billion) in roads maintenance between 2015 and 2020. Jenny Moten, Highways Agency divisional director for Network Services, gave a keynote presentation on the new approach to strategic highways management during the Road Safet
  • Reduced emissions, costs, with recycled asphalt
    February 21, 2012
    Recycling is a key issue for asphalt road construction, with many technologies now coming to market. Bith an ever increasing emphasis on sustainability forcing change in the construction sector in Europe and North America, the highway sector now has to seek new solutions.
  • The drive for US road funding: will corporate America get a seat?
    September 13, 2017
    Trumponomics aims to use public money for pump-priming an even greater amount of cash from the private sector to improve America’s crumbling roads. But is political will matching corporate America’s enthusiasm for more private investment, asks David Arminas If there were ever a test case for comparing public-private partnerships and design-build contracts, the recently completed Ohio River Bridges Project is it (see previous article).